| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
boggsman1
Joined: 24 Jun 2002
Posts: 9120
Location: at a computer
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2019 1:53 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| mat-ty wrote: | | boggsman1 wrote: | | Why don't you guys buy some steaks and get a room... |
You homophobic, bigoted, pos.... That's what mac and his little girlfriend vietnam would have said if I had posted that...  |
Sorry If I offended you, little cupcake... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nw30
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 6485
Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| A sign of somebody who's got zip. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14890
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2019 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| isobars wrote: | Now that Shiff-for-brains' 4 leading witnesses (Kent, Taylor, Sondland, and Yovanovitch) have stated specifically and repeatedly that they know (know, not presume) of no crimes Trump committed relevant to the Ukraine or worthy of impeachment at all (i.e., Trump 4, Shiff 0.0), can can the frigging left get back to the jobs they were elected to do?
Almost all by himself, Schiff's 3.5 year baseless TDS has cost the DNC any chances of winning even a karaoke contest in 2020. |
you shiff for no brains.... how many of trumps people are now in jail... geeee
and get this 1000 former prosecutors have said just the redacted released parts of the Mueller report would be enough to convict trump.
remember Clinton committed no crime in having a relationship with monica. And you right-wingers went after him for that. No national security issue no fraud issue no bribery issues of crimes, no crimes aginst america. No asking for foreighn countries to meddle in our democracy/elections.
So going on from that barr that was set by right wingers and so far all of trumps closest people now convicted...
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14890
Location: on earth
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 9300
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2019 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hahaha, you're coo coo for coconuts....
Judicial Watch announced it obtained a two-page memo, dated May 16, 2017, by then-Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe detailing how then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein proposed wearing a wire into the Oval Office “to collect additional evidence on the president’s true intentions.” McCabe writes that Rosenstein said he thought it was possible because “he was not searched when he entered the White House.”
The memo, which is redacted in key sections, purports to serve as a “contemporaneous recollection” of a meeting that day (“12:30 pm on 5/16/2017”) in Rosenstein’s office. The meeting included Rosenstein, Deputy Assistant AG for Intelligence Tashina Gauhar and Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Jim Crowell in Rosenstein’s Justice Department office.
“This incredible memo details the conflicted and conniving coup effort against President Trump,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “It is astonishing and shocking McCabe thought he could have the FBI conduct a ‘counterintelligence’ operation on the president and Rosenstein thought it would be appropriate to wear a wire to secretly record President Trump in the Oval Office. That the DOJ and FBI sat on this smoking gun for a year shows the need for urgent housecleaning at those agencies.”
READ: http://jwatch.us/ne1Fgf |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vientomas
Joined: 25 Apr 2000
Posts: 2343
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| MalibuGuru wrote: | Hahaha, you're coo coo for coconuts....
Judicial Watch announced it obtained a two-page memo, dated May 16, 2017, by then-Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe detailing how then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein proposed wearing a wire into the Oval Office “to collect additional evidence on the president’s true intentions.” McCabe writes that Rosenstein said he thought it was possible because “he was not searched when he entered the White House.”
The memo, which is redacted in key sections, purports to serve as a “contemporaneous recollection” of a meeting that day (“12:30 pm on 5/16/2017”) in Rosenstein’s office. The meeting included Rosenstein, Deputy Assistant AG for Intelligence Tashina Gauhar and Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Jim Crowell in Rosenstein’s Justice Department office.
“This incredible memo details the conflicted and conniving coup effort against President Trump,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “It is astonishing and shocking McCabe thought he could have the FBI conduct a ‘counterintelligence’ operation on the president and Rosenstein thought it would be appropriate to wear a wire to secretly record President Trump in the Oval Office. That the DOJ and FBI sat on this smoking gun for a year shows the need for urgent housecleaning at those agencies.”
READ: http://jwatch.us/ne1Fgf |
Old "news". https://www.npr.org/2018/09/21/650545077/rosenstein-denies-that-he-discussed-recording-trump-invoking-25th-amendment |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vientomas
Joined: 25 Apr 2000
Posts: 2343
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| As President, Trump's telephone calls are recorded. Where are the recordings of Trump's calls with Sondland? Why is Trump refusing to release them? The recordings are potentialy exculpatory evidence for Trump. Now, if it were you, and you were accused of wrong doing and you had evidence in your possession to prove your innocence, and/or refute what people were claiming you did, wouldn't you give up the information post haste? On the other hand, if the evidence was incriminating, it's likely you would not disclose it...just like Trump. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
What gives Shiffhead the right to blatantly reject the sixth amendment's implications? I know it applies only to all prosecutions, but the principle and intent are clear, and Trump can simply say, "Let me know when the prosecution starts. At that point I'll show you mine when you'll show me yours." (If that needs further explanation, let us know. The second-dumbest lefty here understands the comment clearly.)
Besides, the Left is completely ignoring the fact that this so-called "whistleblower" meets none of the legal criteria of the term, thus does not qualify for its protections. You'd know that if you watched actual impartial news media, or even just the right wing opinion shows. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 9300
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Merry Christmas mutha fukas |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
boggsman1
Joined: 24 Jun 2002
Posts: 9120
Location: at a computer
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Steve O , don’t think so sport .. IG report won’t be recommending prosecution for anyone at top of FBI, not surprising if you’ve been paying attention .. What we do know if 6 Trumpians have been convicted of felonies , with the dirty mayor next .. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|
Search
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Register
