View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dllee
Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 5329 Location: East Bay
|
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2020 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And that is exactly why we can never let engineers run the world.
Everyone knows Hawaiin wind powers your sail more than Lake Tahoe winds.
Except engineers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
windward1
Joined: 18 Jun 2000 Posts: 1400
|
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2020 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dlee,
Tahoe is at a mite higher elevation than the ocean surrounding Hawaii.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dllee
Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 5329 Location: East Bay
|
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2020 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, my bad.
Worse, most dry wind is on fresh water.
But maybe Santa Ana winds pack less punch than fog winds. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PeterSS
Joined: 05 Feb 2009 Posts: 51
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2020 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I stumbled across some Pacific NW forum - and these guys all seem to like the Slingshot 76 and 84 Wings..But they seem to use bigger sails..I guess the wind seems very gusty or fickle there? I was going to use the 76 or 84 with my newer 4.6 and 6.0 Sails.. I have an old Retro 7.5 - but that requires the bigger mast, and is much heavier...at my 170lbs..will my Hover122 + 84 wing + 4.6 - 6.0 sails be sufficient to get pumped onto a plane in marginal winds? And yes the hot air is less dense - making the sail less efficient - like a plane taking off at a hot / high airport - requires a loner runway to take off.. The wind here in the summer is Weak, so hoping the bigger Foil under the water helps! Thanks for all the replies thus far. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gwarn
Joined: 22 May 2013 Posts: 124 Location: SF
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dllee
Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 5329 Location: East Bay
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2020 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Might be, a much smaller low drag foil would get you up and going with the same size sail.
Seen some really light wind foiling done on 900 sq high aspect thin foils. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NOVAAN
Joined: 28 Sep 1994 Posts: 1551
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2020 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is a point of no return for a big investment. Some times it cheaper to go play golf...That said I go out all the time in winds that I can't get going and have a lot of fun just messin around. Any day on the water is a good day |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cgoudie1
Joined: 10 Apr 2006 Posts: 2599 Location: Killer Sturgeon Cove
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2020 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As an Engineer, I can say that wet air is almost always less dense than dry air so dry air should pack more of a punch. It's just physics (or meteorology)
-Craig
dllee wrote: | Yeah, my bad.
Worse, most dry wind is on fresh water.
But maybe Santa Ana winds pack less punch than fog winds. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dllee
Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 5329 Location: East Bay
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2020 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Once again, did you..engineer...think this thru?
Wet air gots h20, which is heavier than pure dry air.
At the same 10 knots, which moves your sail more?
Not talking theory here, just effect in the real world. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dllee
Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 5329 Location: East Bay
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2020 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Engineers talk theory.
Maybe THEIR definition of dense means more air molecules.
More air does not pack the punch of added WATER. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|
|