myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
Hawaii State Law would prohibit WS within 200' of a surfer
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Southwest USA, Hawaii, Mexico
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
swchandler



Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems to me like many of the government folks on Maui are ready to exit windsurfers and what they have to offer. Already county actions have targeted certain rental scenarios on the Northshore trying to disrupt certain vacation opportunities there.

While I enjoyed windsurfing Maui's Northshore on 6 different trips during the 90s (and they were certainly great), I'm thinking that this place is appoaching being over as a vacation destination. Prohibitive restrictive rules are just a way deny different types of participation they don't want. Let's write the spot off.

Nowhere is that great, especially if they hate you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
geohaye



Joined: 03 Apr 2000
Posts: 1437

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Instead of pulling the 'panic alarm', then, we can just rightfully weigh-in as stakeholders. And that is, in fact, all that we have done.

Clearly HI residents must take the lead on this one. There is nothing new under the sun: there have been many battles like this in the past, and there will be many more. To get involved and stay involved is the key.

It will be interesting to hear how this Hearing goes down.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
gregorvass



Joined: 21 Nov 1996
Posts: 1113
Location: Behind You

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sieg Heil MOFOS!!!!!

Don't forget to wipe your helmets with Lysol!!!!!!

Oh yeah, and wear a SEAT BELT while you carry the rig down the stairs.

NO TURNING, Just Straight back and forth in an orderly faschion.


I THINK ITS TIME FOR AN UPRISING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


WAKE UP USA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kurtmagness



Joined: 08 Jul 2006
Posts: 68

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the reason you are seeing this type of thing in Hawaii is because these type of encounters between windsurfers/ surfers or kiters/ surfers/ canoes, etc. happen many times every single day there! I myself have been on both sides many times. Hookipa I believe has a 11 surfers rule. If there are 11 in the water then no wiindsurfing and of course no kiters at all unless it is a contest. I myself have been in the water surfing a Kanaha with 4 other surfers on a perfect offshore day only to be driven out of the water by 3 crazed windsurfers (probably euros) trying to sail in marginal sailing conditions. The main idea is to be cool, respect each other and do not endanger anybody. It's not worth it to hurt somebody or yourself. And don't be a wave hog.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FredBGG



Joined: 01 Aug 2004
Posts: 725

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tsokat wrote:
I agree that us mainlanders can have very limited impact upon Maui's public policy. The local windsurfing interests need to have effective lobbying and consensus building on a local level to protect their and the sport's interests.


Not.....
Tourism is always a concwern for politicians...
Tourists come from the mainland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tsokat



Joined: 15 May 1997
Posts: 326

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is also a shame that they are apparently trying to pass a law applicable to all of Hawaii instead of allowing each island or even park to enact rules that are specific and appropriate to each setting. I think the user agreements on the north shore of Maui have worked remarkably well for years. I am not sure what is behind all of this. One problem we have as windsurfers is that our economic impact on Maui is a drop in the bucket. As luxury development has taken off in places like Wailea, where one night at one of the top resorts can cost you $750 or more, the local government is becoming less and less concerned about a bunch of economy minded lifestylers from the mainland. With this proposed law and the law banning short term rentals on the north shore, I see perhaps a trend to cater to increasingly more wealthy tourists on the south shore and begin returning the north shore to the more or less exclusive use of ethnic Hawaiian locals.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nealpar



Joined: 25 Oct 1998
Posts: 624

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gerritt wrote:

Nowhere have I found windsurfer, sailboard, kiter, or similar defined. Thus, anyone cited in LA for violating this section while windsurfing or kiting should fight it. All of the caselaw surrounding this section clearly deals with motorized watercraft - as in propelled by internal combustion engines or electric motors. Waterskiers and the like (tow surfers probably) fall under the section as they are in the process of being towed by motorized watercraft. They are even included while down waiting for another tow and are not defined at that point in time as "bathers."

That is the state of the law in CA.



I haven't done any thorough legal research on the application of this section to wind-propelled toys, but I have a feeling there isn't much as far as published or citeable case law on this. Thus, the advice of fighting a tciket is sound, however, the person fighting it needs to realize that the outcome is TOTALLY UNPREDICTABLE, and can go either way, depending on the facts, and the kind of judge the person gets.

Bottom line: when it comes to a sailor's word against a lifeguard's, the law enforcement's word will prevail in the judge's eyes. Thus, no amount of "your honor, my windsurfer is not propelled by a jet but by the wind..." type pleading will persuade the judge to disregard the lifeguard's claim that you were recklessly endangering the safety of a surfer or swimmer.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gerritt



Joined: 06 May 1998
Posts: 632
Location: Redwood City, CA

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not necessarily. Any time you are mounting a defense to a criminal charge there basically two ways to go:

1. Factual - your honor, I didn't do what he/she says I did. When coming up against a cop, it is correct to say that most of the time the Judge will side with the cop. Citizen against citizen is a 50/50 crap shoot.

2. Legal. Don't argue with the description given by the cop of what your did. Just state I did it on a windsurfer/kite and therefore have not violated the law. All crimes have elements. Here a Judge would have to decide whether a windsurfer/kite is propelled by machinery. As stated, all cases point to internal combustion engines as the basis for decision and what the statute was written to protect against. Most Judges enjoy a good legal argument. He said she said is fundamentally boring and listening to people quibble over triffles while usually disrespecting each other and the court will piss off any Judge and result in poor outcomes for those who lose and sometimes even for those who win.

BTW - I checked wikipeida for a definition of machine and found the scientific definition includes any device that transforms energy from one form to another. Airfoils are listed. However, science and the law make notoriously poor bedfellows.

I would still fight it. No Judge is going to hurt you for raising an interesting legal defense.

That being said - use common sense and don't get cited to begin with.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
gerritt



Joined: 06 May 1998
Posts: 632
Location: Redwood City, CA

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Two more things:

It is important to understand what you are chaged with. If it something other than the Harbors and Navegations code section mentioned above then find out what the elements of the offense are for the crime chaged.

Also, wikipedia is not legal precident and is not binding on any court. It can be used to guide a court where precident appears lacking. I wouldn't cite it to the court were I defending against such a charge. I doubt the lifeguards will have thought to check it.

So, to recap:

First don't get cited. Second if this is between surfers,swimmers and windsurfers fighting for territory, FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHT TO SHRED!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
madspaniard



Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 380

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kurtmagness wrote:
by 3 crazed windsurfers (probably euros) trying to sail in marginal sailing conditions


did they flash you their passports while sailing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Southwest USA, Hawaii, Mexico All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 2 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group