View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nw30
Joined: 21 Dec 2008 Posts: 6485 Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast
|
Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2013 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mac, how come you haven't been posting the source of the materials you quote?
Not that I would expect any surprises, just wondering.
I always do and then let the source bashers have their way,,,,,,,,, with a comment from me from time to time, only because it gets ridiculous sometimes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
techno900
Joined: 28 Mar 2001 Posts: 4161
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
mac,
It would be interesting to see the definition of what constitutes a reportable spill. Plus, did any of them have a negative environmental impact? The only real issue here.
Maybe just a lot of hot liberal air and meaningless numbers? Maybe not, but your post means absolutely nothing without "the rest of the story", which the media frequently doesn't offer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 17748 Location: Berkeley, California
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Techno--there are definitions under Federal law for what constitutes a "reportable spill". I know, I worked for a discharger and if I didn't report those spills I was the designated felon. Beyond that you can do your own homework.
About media--Baja has proved you wrong a hundred-fold on your views about bias. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
techno900
Joined: 28 Mar 2001 Posts: 4161
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
If the news is reporting about "small spills" without information defining what a small spill constitutes, they are just bowing smoke. Plus, if none of the spills damaged the environment, then I don't see much of an issue.
You are trying to make it an issue when there may be nothing to it.
I did spend some time looking for what the minimum amount of spilled crude oil is reportable, but I didn't find an answer. I guess it's out there, I just wasn't willing to keep searching more than 15 minutes.
If I am an oil producer and I tip over a drum of oil, I suspect that it may be a reportable spill. If I clean it up, then it just becomes another number in the media's hype about damaging the environment.
Look, I am opposed to spills of any kind, but let's stay honest about what a "spill" really is. Most probably amount to nothing, but some are significant and will be news worthy, but there are very, very few in this category.
Just report the "whole" story and not just what suits a particular agenda. This goes for both right and left news agencies. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 17748 Location: Berkeley, California
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Techno whines: Quote: | you are trying to make it an issue when there may be nothing to it. |
Two clicks to get this source. My google line was "What is the legal requirement for reporting oil spills"
http://epa.gov/OEM/docs/oil/spcc/SPCCFactsheetSpillReportingDec06.pdf
There are two questions here. One, did the oil spill do much damage? Two--did the oil companies and the state report the spills as they are legally required to do? Integrity is not something you put on and take off and ignore if you think it is no big deal. The fact is that the company operating the pipeline did not report 300 pipeline oil spills, despite the legal requirement--well known in the discharger arena--and then you rationalized it. Who is blowing smoke?
My point here is that the oil companies can't be trusted. Point made. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
techno900
Joined: 28 Mar 2001 Posts: 4161
|
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Whines" - typical of you mac. I guess it's not possible for you to exchange dialogue without demeaning language. I hope your self esteem is doing better - oops that may be considered demeaning too, so just ignore it.
Thanks, good start on the EPA site. Now what is the reporting requirement for land spills, which is what I was looking for.
And I get your point about your concern about oil companies, that's been clear for ages. My point was about the media and their reporting. Some consumers like to get the "whole" story about the large number of spills and incidents, which were not publically reported. The story makes it look pretty bleak, but if the "small" spills are really inconsequential, then just posting big numbers doesn't tell the "whole" story - my point. I just want more facts.
I think the general public would be interested in what constitutes a reportable spill. My argument was with the reporting, plus you posting it as support for your views. Since you frequently/always repudiate every conservative source that is posted, there is no reason why I can't question your source too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
swchandler
Joined: 08 Nov 1993 Posts: 10588
|
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
techno900, what do you think about all the negative spin and attacks coming from the extreme right about the mainstream media?
You know, 10 to 15 years ago, I don't remember that kind of questionable criticism and such patent scorn. In my view, the picture has been changing, and it's not for the good. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20935
|
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
techno900 wrote: | "Whines" - typical of you mac.... Since you frequently/always repudiate every conservative source... |
or outright refuse to read it before criticizing it, as he stated in our discussions early in the AGW threads. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
techno900
Joined: 28 Mar 2001 Posts: 4161
|
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
swchandler said: Quote: | techno900, what do you think about all the negative spin and attacks coming from the extreme right about the mainstream media?
You know, 10 to 15 years ago, I don't remember that kind of questionable criticism and such patent scorn. In my view, the picture has been changing, and it's not for the good. |
What do you think the negative spin and attacks from the extreme left about the conservative media (what little there is)?
You know, 10 to 15 years ago, I don't remember that kind of questionable criticism and such patent scorn. In my view, the picture has been changing, and it's not for the good. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 17748 Location: Berkeley, California
|
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Techno--what is it about the oil companies breaking the reporting laws that you find acceptable, and are blaming on the media?
By the way, don't whine about how hard it is to find a source if you don't want to be ridiculed for something that is easy to find. Or at least ask for cheese and crackers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|