| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nw30
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 6485
Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2015 12:15 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| baja-human wrote: | | swchandler wrote: | | I have to admit that labeling folks with the "McVeigh" tag is just nonsense, and frankly, it's getting very old. One's bag of tricks needs to be credible, fresh and not at all reliant on a goofy name calling routine. It's better to stick close to the issue or argument in one's comments, and avoid all the off-the-top labeling and weirdness. |
sorry that is the talk the right wing admires and loves. you hear the way trump is talking? And he is running for president...
Obviously that is how Rush got his start and continuous popularity to be the most popular political partisan announcer in the USA in its history...
|
You sir, are no Rush Limbaugh, or the left's version of him.
Have fun keeping up your fantasy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2015 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know ...
Some of these flamethrowers remind me of Limbaugh and why I quit listening to his show in the '90s: he spent a week bashing Hillary's looks then, as though that matters one microscintilla in a first lady or a president. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14890
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2015 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nw30 wrote: | | baja-human wrote: | | swchandler wrote: | | I have to admit that labeling folks with the "McVeigh" tag is just nonsense, and frankly, it's getting very old. One's bag of tricks needs to be credible, fresh and not at all reliant on a goofy name calling routine. It's better to stick close to the issue or argument in one's comments, and avoid all the off-the-top labeling and weirdness. |
sorry that is the talk the right wing admires and loves. you hear the way trump is talking? And he is running for president...
Obviously that is how Rush got his start and continuous popularity to be the most popular political partisan announcer in the USA in its history...
|
You sir, are no Rush Limbaugh, or the left's version of him.
Have fun keeping up your fantasy. |
you are such an low level thinker to think that statement was to say I am a left version of him.
The point being over your paygrade, just as marketing 301 says, you have to talk to the demographic in the terms they talk. So as we see the top contender for president calls people something like low level. I Use the same wording that the right wingers love to hear. Again The Donald even uses it to describe right wingers. If Rush is the number one radio in all the USA/world use the same.
again the donald is number one, so if liked so much by the right wing for a presidential candidate, well a nobody poster on an obscure international board well gee. Do not see ya exploding about the right wingers for their, mild insults, major insults, low level talk, their racist talk and so on low level thinking talk.
Also note I say it to your face for you to rebuttal the point as to why it is so stupid and hence you, I am not a chicken shiiite like the Donald saying behind peoples backs, and same with Rush et all right wing radio,Tv and so on hater announcers.
how many viagra or was it other drugs did the rush get off with? what was in his cigar boxes that he had his domestic employee trading for grugs, or was it doctor shopping? or all the above. and he is a hero to the right... not me...
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2015 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NP wrote: | | When there is equitable criticism by Dean of those that refer to Isobars (and others) by name, and in detail, about such things as medical conditions, place of residence, collecting disability, ... |
There are also the facts that:
1. Those criticisms have been outed by some of their perpetrators to be organized trolling contests ... a sick waste and abuse of forum time and unity to see who can set me off (at everyone else's expense).
2. Every one of their criticisms and accusations regarding those issues has been answered in great detail by me and others, because they imply that all active and retired first responders and military are undeserving leeches abusing government benefits systems.
3. Any response I choose to give is a double win in my column: I get to defend valiant public servants again AND out some more turds (as though they NEED any further "outing").
I can't WAIT to be sitting in some restaurant when an employee mistreats a cop, as has made frequent news stories lately. "Hey, manager; I'm paying for THEIR meal, but I'm not paying for mine if you're going to treat cops like this."
"You can't do that, mister. You've already finished an expensive meal."
"Just watch. Besides ... what're you gonna do ... call the cops?"
Just waitin'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swchandler
Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2015 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"...a sick waste and abuse of forum time and unity to see who can set me off (at everyone else's expense)."
Well NP, looks like you cut close to a nerve with isobars. How easily he associates himself with valiant solders, cops and often firefighters when anyone suggests he's been sucking at the government's teat for years. It's telling how some rationalize their game.
Lastly, the above quote, is a frank admission that when someone or something gets under his skin, he'll boldly throw a tantrum here at everyone's expense. I guess everyone needs to understand, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Obama and Hillary like to cite Australia's gun control successes when threatening to use Executive Actions to curtail gun ownership. Do they think we don't know that Aussies had 3.25M guns before confiscation, and have 3.2M now? Or that they confiscated <700k guns and have since imported over a million for civilians alone? Or that it was mandatory confiscation, not voluntary purchases? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14890
Location: on earth
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| isobars wrote: | | Obama and Hillary like to cite Australia's gun control successes when threatening to use Executive Actions to curtail gun ownership. Do they think we don't know that Aussies had 3.25M guns before confiscation, and have 3.2M now? Or that they confiscated <700k guns and have since imported over a million for civilians alone? Or that it was mandatory confiscation, not voluntary purchases? |
you cited some right wing unsupported rag developed by a 501c3 that i checked and they had no data to their argument on educators are 96%
not,,,, you are giving us another lie. you are a monster... a real sicko monster who does not cite any credible,, by any standard source. you are a hilter propaganda hero...
_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Last edited by real-human on Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:16 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14890
Location: on earth
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KGB-NP
Joined: 25 Jul 2001
Posts: 2856
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
J64TWB
Joined: 24 Dec 2013
Posts: 1685
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|
Search
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Register
