myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
Obama vs. the Tea Party--who can lead?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26 ... 57, 58, 59  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
swchandler



Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588

PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Middle class jobs and wages are a big problem. If Obama had gotten us out of Iraq in the 1st year, focused on small and medium size companies, embraced racial harmony, and been a little more centrist, he'd have been the most admired president in history. His divisive war, racial demagoguery, tax and regulate messages have driven the moderates away."


If President Obama was so terrible, why was he handily re-elected in 2012? Did Obama win because the Republicans were offering such a stellar array of talent and ideas?

You know, your idea of reality is a reflection of where you get your news and information. You watch and listen to a bunch of haters much of the time, sooner or later you become one. Reminds me of the thought that "you are what you eat".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
boggsman1



Joined: 24 Jun 2002
Posts: 9120
Location: at a computer

PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with most, Steve...although , we are in no position to smack Russia. Stat: 2012 saw the 1% own the largest percentage of the country's wealth since.....gulp....1928.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KGB-NP



Joined: 25 Jul 2001
Posts: 2856

PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hate to say this but that game plan for funding the ACA is horrible!
Why reinvent the wheel when there is a working example here?
I've alway thought that the two most destructive forces against business are government and unions. This is just another perfect example.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coboardhead



Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 4303

PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rein

The government pays for almost 50 percent of the health care in the US. In fact, the various government's (federal,state and local) portion of total healthcare is about 7 % of GDP...same as the Canadian government's portion of your GDP. It just pays for a larger portion of your healthcare costs.

Fact is, healthcare is too expensive in this country. Lots of reasons for this...we utilize more healthcare, we are not as healthy, we compensate providers at a higher level, our insurance companies generate a profit, and we have more medical lawsuits.

The various players in healthcare have significant political power. The fact that the ACA was passed, even in its conservative form, is amazing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KGB-NP



Joined: 25 Jul 2001
Posts: 2856

PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

coboardhead wrote:
The government pays for almost 50 percent of the health care in the US.

Let me make one thing perfectly clear. The government doesn't pay for sh!t! They take my money, your money, our money and dispurse it on our behalf.


coboardhead wrote:
The various players in healthcare have significant political power. .
This is the biggest problem in "affordable" health care.

Last edited by KGB-NP on Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:26 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pointster



Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 376

PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

boggsman1 wrote:
I agree with most, Steve...although , we are in no position to smack Russia. Stat: 2012 saw the 1% own the largest percentage of the country's wealth since.....gulp....1928.


It seems to me that if we want a more reasonable distribution of income in this country, there are two basic approaches:

1. The tax and regulate approach. So, tax high income people and redistribute the money to those with lower incomes. Also enforce mandates on employers to provide higher minimum wages, benefit packages, etc.

2. Promote unionization of the workforce. The increased bargaining power of unions will increase wages and improve working conditions, and reduce dependency on government transfer payments.

While I think it is necessary to both approaches, I believe unionization will both increase the rewards for work and reduce reliance on the government programs.

Henry Blodget at Business Insider had an interesting post on the subject, entitled "I've Always Hated The Idea Of Labor Unions, But It May Be Time To Reconsider".

Here's the link: http://www.businessinsider.com/we-may-need-labor-unions-after-all-2012-12
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935

PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

coboardhead wrote:
The fact that the ACA was passed, even in its conservative form, is amazing.

Not when you consider the subterfuge that got it passed. Lying to THE swing vote Congressman to get his vote, rushing it through without allowing congressmen time to read it, endless lying about its costs and features ... all indisputably "caught on tape".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935

PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pointster wrote:
if we want a more reasonable distribution of income in this country ...

Only socialists, poor people with no ambition to succeed, and some poor people mentally or physically UNABLE to succeed want that. The first two deserve its long term results.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KGB-NP



Joined: 25 Jul 2001
Posts: 2856

PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pointster wrote:
1. The tax and regulate approach. So, tax high income people and redistribute the money to those with lower incomes. Also enforce mandates on employers to provide higher minimum wages, benefit packages, etc.

I thought this was the purpose fo the graduated tax plan. Earn more equals pay more. Are you suggesting that those that earn more should pay even more then? Entitlement! If you are talking about closing the loop holes that the wealthy use to not pay their fair share, then yes good, even the playing feild. But the first plans sucks the incentive out of people and is evil in nature.

pointster wrote:
2. Promote unionization of the workforce. The increased bargaining power of unions will increase wages and improve working conditions, and reduce dependency on government transfer payments.
Unions already have increase wages and improved working conditions. Their job is done as far as I'm concerned. They have now become the new greedy power hungry monsters that they were supposed to protect us all from. Unions have created a new unnatural form of social inequality. Could you imagine a creative directors union, salesperson union,...etc union? Imagine when the creative director is not creative and salesperson is no longer selling and you CAN'T fire them because they belong to a union? Sounds insane, huh? That's because it is, yet that is how unions operate. Unions are so out of control in their mobbish thug-like tactics that I truely fear what they are capable of.

Last edited by KGB-NP on Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
joew



Joined: 18 Jul 1999
Posts: 156

PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NW 30, "BHO will basically have handed the key to Putin to be superpower of the world" WHAT combination of drugs and alcohol were you imbibing to come up with this pearl of wisdom??? As has been said,"you can have your own opinion but not your own facts" The Russians ( not the Soviets by the way) Preside over a derelict shadow of their former military power. Ever seen those shots of abandoned, rusting missile subs tied up listing in port?? Every time they try to flex their muscles and field a naval taskforce in some sputtering exercise, they manage to showcase their poor level of maintenance and readiness, If only a shirtless Putin could hurl missiles into orbit with his bulging arms, NW 30, do a little homework before you get up in front of the class! Russian superpower, my ass!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26 ... 57, 58, 59  Next
Page 25 of 59

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group