myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
Texas Flooding
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935

PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The phone call opened with something like, "We're conducting a poll. Do you support eliminating fossil fuel consumption to protect the earth?"

"No."

"Do you agree that fossil fuels drive catastrophic global warming?"

"No"

Click.

I would bet a good fin that if I had said "yes" to both questions I'd have heard the REST of his questions.

OK, I'll explain: He wanted only AGWA/green energy zealots in his poll. I've gotten similar opening questions regarding politics, pot, renewable resources, dams, and more. I gotta start thinking faster and answer those filter questions the way they want so I can confirm or disprove my suspicions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
uwindsurf



Joined: 18 Aug 2012
Posts: 968
Location: Classified

PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

isobars wrote:
The phone call opened with something like, "We're conducting a poll. Do you support eliminating fossil fuel consumption to protect the earth?"

"No."

"Do you agree that fossil fuels drive catastrophic global warming?"

"No"

Click.

I would bet a good fin that if I had said "yes" to both questions I'd have heard the REST of his questions.

OK, I'll explain: He wanted only AGWA/green energy zealots in his poll. I've gotten similar opening questions regarding politics, pot, renewable resources, dams, and more. I gotta start thinking faster and answer those filter questions the way they want so I can confirm or disprove my suspicions.


The REST of the questions are probably predicated upon an affirmative response to one or both if the first two questions. If you respond in the negative to one or both of the first two questions, there are no other questions to ask. If you don't like the manner in which the poll is designed, create your own.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coboardhead



Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 4303

PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Or get caller ID
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935

PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 12:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess I have to explain even further. Hell, yes, the rest of the questions are based on whether my first two answers reveal my biases. Heaven forbid their poll subjects actually include conservative, informed, thoughtful, science-based, and/or rational individuals, lest it tilt their results in the direction opposing their desired outcome.

In polls where they weren't smart enough to filter the "opposition" with questions like that, they used to keep asking the same question over and over using slightly different words in the hope of soliciting a "Yes", at which point they quickly introduced a new question. They finally figured out that it took less time to winnow out the opposition up front rather than try to confuse them with baffling sentence constructions later on. The defense lawyer in federal court tried the latter trick on me once, too, and it cost her client -- the U.S. Air Force -- a seven figure judgement. Just like some pollsters, she threw several negatives -- I counted at least six before losing track altogether -- into one question and demanded a yes/no response.

"Sorry, Ms. Smith, but I honestly got lost in the negatives. My answer is ..." and over her objections I gave her a full declarative sentence minus all the obfuscation.

"No further questions, your honor."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935

PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

coboardhead wrote:
Or get caller ID

That is no longer of use. It's too easy to spoof (i.e., spammers can display anything they wish in your Caller ID), many legitimate calls show only "private caller" or "U.S. West", and the Mayo Clinic's fax system has been making prank calls intermittently for years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
techno900



Joined: 28 Mar 2001
Posts: 4162

PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iso said:
Quote:
That is no longer of use.


That's why there is voice mail. I never answer an unknown caller.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
beaglebuddy



Joined: 10 Feb 2012
Posts: 1120

PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 2:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who has a land line phone anymore?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MalibuGuru



Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 9300

PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I even got a call from "Grandma"......
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935

PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2015 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

techno900 wrote:
iso said:
Quote:
That is no longer of use.


That's why there is voice mail. I never answer an unknown caller.

You will when you're expecting calls from multiple hospitals about your surgery AND radiation AND metastases scan, from your builder about your ongoing kitchen remodel, from your urologist about your bladder cancer, from the IRS about the tax refund a Russian hacker stole, and much more ... in the space of one week. Voice mail is FAR too unreliable for any of that.

beaglebuddy wrote:
Who has a land line phone anymore?

Sailing buddy Jim lives 6-8 miles away in the same "city" of 300,000 people. He's on AT&T, I'm on Verizon, we both have state of the art smart phones. Our cell phone conversations are almost useless strings of "Huh? Say again? What? You're cutting out. I can't heaaarrrrr you ..." in both directions. It's not acceptable for serious communication. I almost never carry my cell phone except when I go sailing and need wind data; I'm not that willing to be others' slave (e.g., the telemarketer who refused to stop calling me and said my only escape is not answering MY phone. He got an earful of my Freon boat horn). My cell phone often goes untouched for weeks to months in the winter. Besides, the first telemarketer or politician who calls my cell phone had better hope I can't lay hands on him. To guard against that, only three people on the planet including my wife-- not even my doctors or medical travel agency or my builder -- have my cell phone number legitimately, and I STILL get some spam calls. A few more and I'm changing my number.

Don't get me started on cell phones. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swchandler



Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588

PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2015 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Who has a land line phone anymore?"


I do. I've never have owned a cellphone, and that's saved me tons over the years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 5 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group