myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
Liberals.....the scum of the earth.
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mat-ty



Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 4475

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 6:44 pm    Post subject: Liberals.....the scum of the earth. Reply with quote

What the liberal slim in Washington are doing today to Kavanaugh is Exactly what they did 20 years ago.

All you scumbag liberals need to watch this, I doubt any of you clowns could make it to the end...




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZURHD5BU1o8


Last edited by mat-ty on Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:18 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 10918
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn't Erath a wineery? https://www.wine.com/product/erath-pinot-noir-2015/190535?state=CA&s=GoogleBase_CSE_&cid=GoogleBase_CSE_190535_1944&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=PRODUCT%20GROUP&utm_campaign=Google_Shopping_CA_Beta&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI957KsPDU3QIVgX1-Ch3AygHeEAQYASABEgKWAPD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

I'll drink to that, they make a good Pinot Noir.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mat-ty



Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 4475

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're much better off pointing out typos than trying to defend what Dems have done and are doing today to our democracy. Disgusting , shameful , banana republic tactics.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nw30



Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 4991
Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually it goes back to medieval times and the inquisition, back when all that was needed is to be charged with a crime
or blasphemy, and it was up to the charged to prove his innocence.

The seriousness of the charge, has to be accompanied with the seriousness of the evidence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coboardhead



Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 3002

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmm. Well the nomrainating President, a Republican, ordered the FBI investigation and the Senate was controlled by Democrats and Thomas was confirmed.

Then in an unprecedented action...yes unprecedented...(Matty do your homework rather than regurgitate right wing talking points) McConnel derails Obama's moderate choice (Obama picked someone praised by leading GOP...Garland..)

So, the GOP picked a political hack not up to the job with a chink in his armor.

Personally, there is always too much at stake when a court leans too far left or too far right and I don't have a problem with those who use legitimate reasons to derail a nomination in an attempt to maintain a balanced court. There's enough here to take a look. Just as there was with Thomas. Thomas was confirmed....let Kavanaugh have his day.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coboardhead



Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 3002

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BTW, Matty. You are aware that there was a corroborating witness to Hill's testimony? Both the Democrats and the Repubs agreed not to call her. The bottom line was that Thomas would get the confirmation regardless.

So, are you saying the Libs are scum for fighting Thomas's confirmation or letting it happen?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mat-ty



Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 4475

PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

coboardhead wrote:
BTW, Matty. You are aware that there was a corroborating witness to Hill's testimony? Both the Democrats and the Repubs agreed not to call her. The bottom line was that Thomas would get the confirmation regardless.

So, are you saying the Libs are scum for fighting Thomas's confirmation or letting it happen?



Complete scum, and no surprise you would defend them...

The garland situation was unique and the man was not accused of SEX CRIMES and would not have his name tarnished for life..... disgusting!!!!

Your opinion of Kavanaugh is beyond ignorant....Political Hack??????

Maybe you should do your homework and stop regurgitating left wing BS.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mat-ty



Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 4475

PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

coboardhead wrote:
Hmmm. Well the nomrainating President, a Republican, ordered the FBI investigation and the Senate was controlled by Democrats and Thomas was confirmed.

Then in an unprecedented action...yes unprecedented...(Matty do your homework rather than regurgitate right wing talking points) McConnel derails Obama's moderate choice (Obama picked someone praised by leading GOP...Garland..)

So, the GOP picked a political hack not up to the job with a chink in his armor.

Personally, there is always too much at stake when a court leans too far left or too far right and I don't have a problem with those who use legitimate reasons to derail a nomination in an attempt to maintain a balanced court. There's enough here to take a look. Just as there was with Thomas. Thomas was confirmed....let Kavanaugh have his day.


Wrong again!!!


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/theres-precedent-for-merrick-garlands-supreme-court-snub/2017/04/06/02544902-197f-11e7-8598-9a99da559f9e_story.html?utm_term=.45586a7f2b3b
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
boggsman1



Joined: 24 Jun 2002
Posts: 6456
Location: at a computer

PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mat-ty wrote:
coboardhead wrote:
BTW, Matty. You are aware that there was a corroborating witness to Hill's testimony? Both the Democrats and the Repubs agreed not to call her. The bottom line was that Thomas would get the confirmation regardless.

So, are you saying the Libs are scum for fighting Thomas's confirmation or letting it happen?



Complete scum, and no surprise you would defend them...

The garland situation was unique and the man was not accused of SEX CRIMES and would not have his name tarnished for life..... disgusting!!!!

Your opinion of Kavanaugh is beyond ignorant....Political Hack??????

Maybe you should do your homework and stop regurgitating left wing BS.


Yes, hack... Take a look at his work on the Clinton Impeachment. WARNING: it requires reading. Kav insisted on releasing the gory details to the public, against Starr's better judgement....He also supported Dubya's pick of Harriet Meyers for SCOTUS!!! R U kidding me.... Kav is being nominated because he is quite political, and a huge ally to the Republican party if things get dicey next year for tRump.....
We can do better than a drunk preppy groper..... much better...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mat-ty



Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 4475

PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

boggsman1 wrote:
mat-ty wrote:
coboardhead wrote:
BTW, Matty. You are aware that there was a corroborating witness to Hill's testimony? Both the Democrats and the Repubs agreed not to call her. The bottom line was that Thomas would get the confirmation regardless.

So, are you saying the Libs are scum for fighting Thomas's confirmation or letting it happen?



Complete scum, and no surprise you would defend them...

The garland situation was unique and the man was not accused of SEX CRIMES and would not have his name tarnished for life..... disgusting!!!!

Your opinion of Kavanaugh is beyond ignorant....Political Hack??????

Maybe you should do your homework and stop regurgitating left wing BS.


Yes, hack... Take a look at his work on the Clinton Impeachment. WARNING: it requires reading. Kav insisted on releasing the gory details to the public, against Starr's better judgement....He also supported Dubya's pick of Harriet Meyers for SCOTUS!!! R U kidding me.... Kav is being nominated because he is quite political, and a huge ally to the Republican party if things get dicey next year for tRump.....
We can do better than a drunk preppy groper..... much better...




Bottom line...the left could not hurt him in the nomination , vetting process so they resorted to sleaze ball banana republic tactics.
If he's as bad as you say why the gutter tactics????????

Are you seriously going to defend Clinton and his disgusting behavior? which was current at the time not 36 fucking years old... bad comparison.

And what nominee is not political????? Obamas two picks that met almost ZERO resistance are as far left as you can get.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group