myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
Free-Ride board choice
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Windsurfing Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
acalhounguy



Joined: 25 May 2013
Posts: 57

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:26 pm    Post subject: Free-Ride board choice Reply with quote

I am looking for a smaller board for higher wind days locally. I live in Minnesota and usually windsurf at Lake Calhoun but also in northern MN. My current boards are Ultrasonic (93cm width and 147L), Gecko 120 (77cm width), Xcite Ride 145 (75cm wide). Not surprisingly the Gecko and Xcite are pretty similar overall.

I am looking for a board that handles chop well and gybes well - next up would be jumping performance and lastly would be speed (the chop is particularly bad at times at Calhoun so too much speed can get hairy). Goal is to use the board in conditions where a 5.0 - 6.5 sail would be ideal.

My candidates are:
Naish Starship 115
Tabou 3S 116
Futura 104
Fanatic Hawk 113
Exocet Cross 114

What do you guys think about these boards for my requirements? I think they are all appealing boards and all would probably be great fun.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
U2U2U2



Joined: 06 Jul 2001
Posts: 5467
Location: Shipsterns Bluff, Tasmania. Colorado

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would consider the Goya One, Fanatic with 3 fins, both in smaller than your looking at.

Off the list a Naish Starship, but 100liters.

_________________
K4 fins
4Boards....May the fours be with you

http://www.k4fins.com/fins.html
http://4boards.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LeeD



Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 1175

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

5.0 to 6.5.
From the two smaller boards you already have, looks like you favor good handling, especially jibing, over speed.
Smaller Gecko, or MagicRide in that sizing, or Atom in that sizing.
Imagine you weigh well over 200 lbs., as all your boards are big.
Futura is the fastest, by far, and not great for bigger chop.
Hawk and Starship next in speed.
Cross and 3S should handle steep confused chop the best, but of course, not plane up as quickly, nor go as fast as the 3 above.
Pick your poison. Geck, MR, or Atom would help you jibe the most, and allow for smooth curving arcs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
acalhounguy



Joined: 25 May 2013
Posts: 57

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why smaller, why 3 fin for lake sailing? I am hesitant to go below 110L as a typical 20 knot day is 5 gusting to 30+ so there can be a fair bit of slogging and for me 110 is the comfortable level.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
acalhounguy



Joined: 25 May 2013
Posts: 57

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right - the gecko / magic ride / atom etc free-wide boards are ideal for our wind conditions which are up and down but a little rough in chop which is why I'm considering a traditional freeride or FSW shape for my next step down. I weigh 185. I'm becoming a better sailor which is another reason to have a smaller board.

I'm thinking V bottom and double concaves for comfort and gybing in chop - correct? I'm intrigued by the starship in this regard but I still think it would be pretty fast if not an early planer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LeeD



Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 1175

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

At 185, you'd be considering the freewide boards at 105 liter sizing, as the width of a 104 Magic is 69 cm., and plenty of float for anyone under 200 lbs.
The narrow tail of Atom and Magic Rides allow trim well to the tail, so most of the board is gliding over the chop. Width up at the mast track area is usually OK because it's well clear of the water when planing.
We have a Futura, Magic Ride, and SuperSport now, and a Speedster coming in a week.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Arrgh



Joined: 05 May 1998
Posts: 864
Location: Rio

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a Cross 104 and a new 3S 96. The Cross is pretty cushy in chop; the 3S annihilates chop. Plus, the 3S is waaay faster. It was a little unnerving at first, going that fast into steep chop, nose just above the waves, but the 3S just takes it in stride without any concern. Both boards jibe quite easily.

Last edited by Arrgh on Mon Jul 04, 2016 5:33 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
acalhounguy



Joined: 25 May 2013
Posts: 57

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right. Thanks all. I like my Gecko 120 a lot and would probably like a 105L also in higher wind so good suggestion. I'm thinking the 3S or the Starship might be smoother which is why I am favoring them.

I have learned that equipment rarely solves my problems anyway, usually the problem is technique. In the end, probably anything in the 100-115L / 65-70 cm range is going to be fine and the differences will ultimately be small. I'm looking for comfort/control/something I can jibe through confused chop. We get reflected waves due to concrete shoreline in some parts of the lake depending on wind direction.

I have never heard a single negative thing about the 3S, everyone seems to love it. I was thinking that would be my next board until I read about the starship and it seems to have the design elements I'm looking for as well. I enjoyed the hawk 113 in Bonaire - it was better over chop than a gecko used side-by-side which was the genesis of this thought process. I got to try a bunch of boards there and, for me, below 110L was about where the slogging got a lot harder.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
boardsurfr



Joined: 23 Aug 2001
Posts: 1266

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

acalhounguy wrote:
I enjoyed the hawk 113 in Bonaire - it was better over chop than a gecko used side-by-side which was the genesis of this thought process.

Interesting. I sailed Hawks and Geckos a couple of years ago in Tobago, and much preferred the Geckos. Tobago has more chop than Bonaire - it's deeper and has tidal currents that can create voodoo chop. Before that, I had sailed the Hawk in Hatteras, and really liked it. Maybe the Hawk handles small and regular chop well enough, or maybe the chop handling changed over the years.

That said, you can't go wrong with the 3S, it smooth and can be fast. I have one and see others on our beaches a lot, but they are hard to find used because the board is a keeper.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
U2U2U2



Joined: 06 Jul 2001
Posts: 5467
Location: Shipsterns Bluff, Tasmania. Colorado

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

acalhounguy wrote:
Why smaller, why 3 fin for lake sailing? I am hesitant to go below 110L as a typical 20 knot day is 5 gusting to 30+ so there can be a fair bit of slogging and for me 110 is the comfortable level.


The initial post said higher wind, this I suppose is a interpretative term.
I see you did post your weight now.

So going too small is out of your comfort zone. The Gecko is not going to handle , well, higher wind, neither the JP, you might try a smaller fin.

It's extremely difficult to asset the liters , size of a board for someone else.
The potential sail size on this would be useful, don't recall it, will retread.
The width of today's boards is part of the equation, along with the liters stated.

3Finned....lake...non wave

Since multi fins came back into vogue, the companies have expanded ever more into additional fins on FSW boards, IMO no longer a trend to sell kit, it works.

A Tri fin will improve : upwind..more fin area
Faster tighter turns, esp jibes...pivot is less
More planted to the water... Better control in chop, confused sea states.

They will have 2 areas that are commonly considered negatives.
Early planing.. Suffers due to drag on the additional fins. This can be compensated some,by use of efficient fins.
Top speed will be compromised, again , more drag, again fin selection.

Since its higher wind the early planning should matter NOT so much, if top speed is critical, then a FREERACE single fin board is the ticket.

THE newest , like this years 3S is said to be much improved.
The Starship has great reviews.

_________________
K4 fins
4Boards....May the fours be with you

http://www.k4fins.com/fins.html
http://4boards.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Windsurfing Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group