View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20935
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
DelmarEdward wrote: | i know i'm not that heavy at 200-205, but with a 4/3 suit, seat harness, booties, rig, neoprene hat the 133 deck was awash. |
Have you weighed your board lately? 133 liters should float 290# (including EVERYTHING ... you, your clothes, fin, rig, the board itself) at a total standstill before the deck is awash. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DelmarEdward
Joined: 05 Aug 2012 Posts: 72
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
went out again today with same board, bic 133, and same 8.0 retro sail.
clearly the problem must have been my downhaul setting, in about the same light winds as friday, in downhauled a couple of more cms and lowered the stop on the mast extension (which i left up on friday elevating the whole sail)
and the sail felt completely different today, much more balanced and easy to use.
also lowered the boom a little which made for a more comfortable ride.
thanks all for the help. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kmf
Joined: 02 Apr 2001 Posts: 503
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sailworks has unsurpassed sail support. Simply calling the loft will put you in touch with Dale Cook or Bruce Peterson and they will be glad to help you with your settings. Rigging help can be found here...
http://www.sailworks.com/the-gear/sails/retro.html
KMF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20935
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But be forewarned: Bruce uses tiny little short harness lines (much shorter than mine) and bigger sails than I do, so his advice must be all wrong. And, of course, Dale runs slalom boards and big sails tuned for a high center of effort in huge swell, so we all should.
Just so no one can say I'm criticizing them, what I AM criticizing is the common advice that we common people should use the same gear, settings, and techniques as pros (um, which ones?) with more raw talent than we have and more dedicated TOW than most of us can achieve. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
U2U2U2
Joined: 06 Jul 2001 Posts: 5467 Location: Shipsterns Bluff, Tasmania. Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DelmarEdward wrote: | went out again today with same board, bic 133, and same 8.0 retro sail.
clearly the problem must have been my downhaul setting, in about the same light winds as friday, in downhauled a couple of more cms and lowered the stop on the mast extension (which i left up on friday elevating the whole sail)
and the sail felt completely different today, much more balanced and easy to use.
also lowered the boom a little which made for a more comfortable ride.
thanks all for the help. |
Sounds like a massive improvement.
It's nice to have a follow up on theses threads , far too many are never heard from . Cheers _________________ K4 fins
4Boards....May the fours be with you
http://www.k4fins.com/fins.html
http://4boards.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
swchandler
Joined: 08 Nov 1993 Posts: 10588
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, when it comes right down to it, Sailwork's online rigging guide is one of the best I've seen. The full spectrum of tuning possibilities are clearly covered and visually displayed. Very organized and well presented. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jingebritsen
Joined: 21 Aug 2002 Posts: 3371
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
another common issue that sailors "do unto themselves," they leave their base extensions jacked up too high.
what's the cost? depends on the sail. higher center of effort, not good. the tack foot is too far away from the mast, makes the sail have an ugly set of wrinkles no matter how much batten tension. sail never quite feels right.
benefit? if the wind comes up, don't have to readjust.... larger RAF's andcam sails need less tuning with down haul than maybe we all thought for years. again, tune with mast foot placement, boom height, and out haul. _________________ www.aerotechsails.com
www.exocet-original.com
www.iwindsurf.com
http://www.epicgearusa.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
joethewindsufa
Joined: 10 Oct 2010 Posts: 1190 Location: Montréal
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what you say John is ALWAYS like gold , but this one i don't get:
"mast extension too high"
if one rigs with more extension, but does NOT pull it all the way down, like on a slalom board where the mast base is lowered on the deck, what does that change ?
just for fun, here is an old sail photo:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jingebritsen
Joined: 21 Aug 2002 Posts: 3371
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
The proximity of the tack foot to the mast changes the luff curve enough on some sails significantly enough to make the sail look wonky, but sail kinda shitty too. 1. raised center of effort. 2. strange straight or catenary lines in sail surface that cannot be tuned out with batten tension, or even switching masts.
been there, seen that. 2cm extra is fine. 5cm + it becomes quite noticeable. _________________ www.aerotechsails.com
www.exocet-original.com
www.iwindsurf.com
http://www.epicgearusa.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jingebritsen
Joined: 21 Aug 2002 Posts: 3371
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|
|