View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14890 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
techno900 wrote: | wsurfer said: Quote: | Check your knowledge and math. You are so far from knowledge and Malibu, and being a Guru
So there's something called an EMF. Google it , educate yourself and call or PM me later! I'll help you out to a better understanding!
|
I don't know the answer to this, but you assume that a burning up reentry nuke will go off and create an EMP or EMF. It's usually pretty tricky to set off a nuke. Enlighten us. |
The usa set off emp force with a simple weather balloon you bafoon.
As I have mentioned all they need to do is put a submarine or fishing boat out in international waters some 100 miles offshore and release a bunch on weather balloons that would not be detected till they went off. The triggers are very simple, by altitude, that technology is very simple and probably only a few hundred dollars. Again his physicists and engineers are not stupid and this would be the first thing I would expect them to have done as Trumpo made his first remark about them running for president in light of the Bush doctrine of unproved regime change, Reagan unprovoked regime change on several occasions. Again right-wingers who talk protectionism seem in all cultures are a clear and present danger. _________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
techno900
Joined: 28 Mar 2001 Posts: 4161
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
baja said: Quote: | The usa set off emp force with a simple weather balloon you bafoon. |
Gee, I don't recall a test of a nuke or "emp force" on a balloon on the tip of a ICBM burning up in the atmosphere upon reentry, then setting off an EMP.
Only in the mistical world of Baja does such logic exist.
For those with short memories, the issue is whether "rocket man" has one that can reenter the atmosphere (without burning up) and is still capable of hitting a target and going off? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14890 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
techno900 wrote: | baja said: Quote: | The usa set off emp force with a simple weather balloon you bafoon. |
Gee, I don't recall a test of a nuke or "emp force" on a balloon on the tip of a ICBM burning up in the atmosphere upon reentry, then setting off an EMP.
Only in the mistical world of Baja does such logic exist.
For those with short memories, the issue is whether "rocket man" has one that can reenter the atmosphere (without burning up) and is still capable of hitting a target and going off? |
nope as I said you do not need one that can be on a rocket you low-level thinker. Read the tests the usa did with weather balloons way back I think in the 60s that knocked out even electronics in Hawaii a thousand or so miles away. And those were small nukes. again all you have to do is be in international waters ideally with the wind onshore and blow up a weather balloon, and with simple few hundred dollar triggers boom... emp and all you need to take out the USA in essences is 5-10 of them. what 10s to hundreds of millions will die? _________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14890 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
techno900 wrote: | baja said: Quote: | The usa set off emp force with a simple weather balloon you bafoon. |
Gee, I don't recall a test of a nuke or "emp force" on a balloon on the tip of a ICBM burning up in the atmosphere upon reentry, then setting off an EMP.
Only in the mistical world of Baja does such logic exist.
For those with short memories, the issue is whether "rocket man" has one that can reenter the atmosphere (without burning up) and is still capable of hitting a target and going off? |
nope as I said you do not need one that can be on a rocket you low-level thinker. Read the tests the usa did with weather balloons way back I think in the 60s that knocked out even electronics in Hawaii a thousand or so miles away. And those were small nukes. again all you have to do is be in international waters ideally with the wind onshore and blow up a weather balloon, and with simple few hundred dollar triggers boom... emp and all you need to take out the USA in essences is 5-10 of them. what 10s to hundreds of millions will die?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_electromagnetic_pulse
Quote: | History
The fact that an electromagnetic pulse is produced by a nuclear explosion was known in the earliest days of nuclear weapons testing. The magnitude of the EMP and the significance of its effects, however, were not immediately realized.[1]
During the first United States nuclear test on 16 July 1945, electronic equipment was shielded because Enrico Fermi expected the electromagnetic pulse. The official technical history for that first nuclear test states, "All signal lines were completely shielded, in many cases doubly shielded. In spite of this many records were lost because of spurious pickup at the time of the explosion that paralyzed the recording equipment."[2] During British nuclear testing in 1952–1953 instrumentation failures were attributed to "radioflash", which was their term for EMP.[3][4]
The first openly reported observation of the unique aspects of high-altitude nuclear EMP occurred during the helium balloon lofted Yucca nuclear test of the Hardtack I series on 28 April 1958. In that test, the electric field measurements from the 1.7 kiloton weapon went off the scale of the test instruments and was estimated to be about 5 times the oscilloscope limits. The Yucca EMP was initially positive-going whereas low-altitude bursts were negative pulses. Also, the polarization of the Yucca EMP signal was horizontal, whereas low-altitude nuclear EMP was vertically polarized. In spite of these many differences, the unique EMP results were dismissed as a possible wave propagation anomaly.[5]
The high-altitude nuclear tests of 1962, as discussed below, confirmed the unique results of the Yucca high-altitude test and increased the awareness of high-altitude nuclear EMP beyond the original group of defense scientists. The larger scientific community became aware of the significance of the EMP problem after a three-article series on nuclear EMP was published in 1981 by William J. Broad in Science.[1][6][7] |
_________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14890 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
MalibuGuru wrote: | wynsurfer wrote: | Electro- magnetic pulse does not even have to come close to disable the power grid and knock out almost all computers far more damaging than any bomb. |
I have a Faraday cage and a couple of gold coins, just in case. |
tooo funny....
hi cageman....
I always knew you lived in a cage.... do they dangle the coins outside the cage to torture you? do you pee on yourself like trump hires prostitutes to do? or can you flush in your cage...
do you also wear tin foil? when they let you out of the cage? _________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Last edited by real-human on Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:58 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993 Posts: 9300
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Let's all chip in to send Dean to N Korea....on vacation |
|
Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14890 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MalibuGuru wrote: | Let's all chip in to send xxxx to N Korea....on vacation |
awe,,, struck a gold fanged, in the bunkerized foil hat barfie town... _________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993 Posts: 9300
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Time to win again.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14890 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MalibuGuru wrote: | Time to win again.. |
who let you out of your cage? cageman... did you notice he and trump have the same style haicut, bizzare... like they have been in a faraday cage with you.
stall tactic, thats what he did with all the others.... but now seems trump may be backpeddling.... someone has told him that this is NK MO. stall stall stall till they have what it takes...
again USA needs to tell putin and china leaders he launches and we take out putin and chinese leaders... including their private militaries and private police.
Note how Putin just assigned a few in the UK, and has just threatened to nuke the UK. Putin could care less about losing a few hundred million... Time to make sure he knows we will take him out if it takes 20 years. _________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MalibuGuru
Joined: 11 Nov 1993 Posts: 9300
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Reported today...
On the list? A peace treaty with America and a U.S. embassy within the hermit kingdom.
The Daily Wire has more:
Kim Jong Un desperately wants to sign a peace treaty with President Trump after their one-on-one meeting, and he’ll also invite the United States to build an embassy in the hermit kingdom, South Korea media is reporting.
“Kim is likely to raise the possibility of a peace treaty, along with establishing diplomatic relations and nuclear disarmament, during a meeting with the U.S. leader, the Dong-A Ilbo newspaper said Monday,” Bloomberg News reported.
North Korea and the U.S. have been in a standoff for more than 60 years. The Korean War ended not with their surrender, but instead an “armistice,” which is nothing more than a truce. The U.S. has kept a large military force in South Korea ever since.
Koh Yu-hwan, who teaches North Korean studies at Dongguk University in Seoul, told Bloomberg that “the U.S. wants a peace treaty at the end of the denuclearization process, while for the North, it’s the precondition for its denuclearization.” |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|