myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
Climate Change
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 136, 137, 138 ... 142, 143, 144  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
boggsman1



Joined: 24 Jun 2002
Posts: 7646
Location: at a computer

PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2019 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gents , this is the Climate Change forum... Can we get back the:there's nothing wrong, let's keep polluting argument?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 13325
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nw30 wrote:
mac wrote:
nw30 wrote:
mac wrote:
Courts? In every day, one of the stooges demonstrates their deep lack of knowledge of facts and civics.

Carry on. We know you would fail a poll test.
If it goes to the Senate, that is conducted like a court, the Senate will require that the accused face his accuser, the factious whistleblower, just like in any civil or criminal trial. Nobody can get convicted for any kind of crime if charged by somebody that remains anonymous, this isn't Russia or China, that throws juris prudence out the window.
Good luck with that, and quit trying to be smart, you're just a biased tool showing your lack of legal understanding.


My god, are you really this stupid? Whistle-blower laws have been around since the early days of our country, and the current one protects the identity of the person.

You really are this stupid.

Name one person that has been ruled guilty of a crime due purely to an anonymous "witness" in this country in modern times, it doesn't happen. There is no whistle-blower protection in a court, only during an investigation. It is that anonymous "witness" that started the latest attempt for impeachment after the other attempts have failed. I'll repeat, the accused has a constitutional right to face his accuser in court, a Senate trial is called a "trial" for a reason.
BTW, are you sure you're not Dean? You sound very immature just like him.
.

Obviously you are either this stupid, or just repeating talking points that you don't understand. But I'll spell it out for you.

1. An impeachment is not a criminal trial. When Trump is impeached, his accuser is not the whistle blower, it is the majority in the House. The only thing that the whistle blower did is start the investigation--for which you seem to understand that he or she has a right of anonymity.

2. The whistle-blower did not have, or claim to have, first hand knowledge of Trump's crimes. However, 17 witnesses have attested to Trump's crimes. Those are the accusers that Trump and his enablers have a right to cross-examination, and the GOP has tried.

3. Twelve Trump political appointees who have defied Congressional subpoenas, an action completely without precedent in US History. The refusal of the Executive Branch to cooperate, or even participate, in Congressional oversight is a grave threat to our system of government. It would make of Trump a king--immune from the oversight established by the Constitution. It is a crime even worse than helping Russia for personal gain. If Republicans enable this they should all be thrown out of office.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nw30



Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 6020
Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast

PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

boggsman1 wrote:
I doubt it...
That would be lame..
I agree 100%, yet,,,,,,,,,,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
boggsman1



Joined: 24 Jun 2002
Posts: 7646
Location: at a computer

PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They are recognizing that the future is always in the hands of the youth... I guess its an easy out for TIME....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MalibuGuru



Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 8650

PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 12:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 13325
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 4:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn’t it interesting how the three stooges can repost Koch brother talking points and images—but are ignorant of the damage done by coal and oil.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
boggsman1



Joined: 24 Jun 2002
Posts: 7646
Location: at a computer

PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Twittersphere is lighting up with pissed off older men mocking the young lady. I think the TIME person of the year is a joke in general, but I wouldn't mock a young teenager's passion for an important subject...


on cue today, like Pavlov:

So ridiculous. Greta must work on her Anger Management problem, then go to a good old fashioned movie with a friend! Chill Greta, Chill! https://t.co/M8ZtS8okzE

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2019


Last edited by boggsman1 on Thu Dec 12, 2019 11:50 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 13325
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

At least we’re back on topic. It is no surprise that old men who aren’t getting any are pissed off when faced with a yound woman that is clearly way smarter than they are. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mat-ty



Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 6884

PostPosted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mac wrote:
At least we’re back on topic. It is no surprise that old men who aren’t getting any are pissed off when faced with a yound woman that is clearly way smarter than they are. Laughing



I'm sure all of the 28 subscribers to TIME are thrilled......I thought that rag went under years ago.. Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mat-ty



Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 6884

PostPosted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You gotta love Lizzy......blue new deal to end all offshore drilling..we get 30% of our oil from OSD....of course she has no plan to fill the void....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 136, 137, 138 ... 142, 143, 144  Next
Page 137 of 144

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group