| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mat-ty
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 7850
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 6:44 pm Post subject: Liberals.....the scum of the earth. |
 |
|
What the liberal slim in Washington are doing today to Kavanaugh is Exactly what they did 20 years ago.
All you scumbag liberals need to watch this, I doubt any of you clowns could make it to the end...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZURHD5BU1o8
Last edited by mat-ty on Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:18 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17747
Location: Berkeley, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mat-ty
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 7850
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You're much better off pointing out typos than trying to defend what Dems have done and are doing today to our democracy. Disgusting , shameful , banana republic tactics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nw30
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 6485
Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually it goes back to medieval times and the inquisition, back when all that was needed is to be charged with a crime
or blasphemy, and it was up to the charged to prove his innocence.
The seriousness of the charge, has to be accompanied with the seriousness of the evidence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
coboardhead
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 4303
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm. Well the nomrainating President, a Republican, ordered the FBI investigation and the Senate was controlled by Democrats and Thomas was confirmed.
Then in an unprecedented action...yes unprecedented...(Matty do your homework rather than regurgitate right wing talking points) McConnel derails Obama's moderate choice (Obama picked someone praised by leading GOP...Garland..)
So, the GOP picked a political hack not up to the job with a chink in his armor.
Personally, there is always too much at stake when a court leans too far left or too far right and I don't have a problem with those who use legitimate reasons to derail a nomination in an attempt to maintain a balanced court. There's enough here to take a look. Just as there was with Thomas. Thomas was confirmed....let Kavanaugh have his day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
coboardhead
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 4303
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BTW, Matty. You are aware that there was a corroborating witness to Hill's testimony? Both the Democrats and the Repubs agreed not to call her. The bottom line was that Thomas would get the confirmation regardless.
So, are you saying the Libs are scum for fighting Thomas's confirmation or letting it happen? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mat-ty
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 7850
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| coboardhead wrote: | BTW, Matty. You are aware that there was a corroborating witness to Hill's testimony? Both the Democrats and the Repubs agreed not to call her. The bottom line was that Thomas would get the confirmation regardless.
So, are you saying the Libs are scum for fighting Thomas's confirmation or letting it happen? |
Complete scum, and no surprise you would defend them...
The garland situation was unique and the man was not accused of SEX CRIMES and would not have his name tarnished for life..... disgusting!!!!
Your opinion of Kavanaugh is beyond ignorant....Political Hack??????
Maybe you should do your homework and stop regurgitating left wing BS. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mat-ty
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 7850
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| coboardhead wrote: | Hmmm. Well the nomrainating President, a Republican, ordered the FBI investigation and the Senate was controlled by Democrats and Thomas was confirmed.
Then in an unprecedented action...yes unprecedented...(Matty do your homework rather than regurgitate right wing talking points) McConnel derails Obama's moderate choice (Obama picked someone praised by leading GOP...Garland..)
So, the GOP picked a political hack not up to the job with a chink in his armor.
Personally, there is always too much at stake when a court leans too far left or too far right and I don't have a problem with those who use legitimate reasons to derail a nomination in an attempt to maintain a balanced court. There's enough here to take a look. Just as there was with Thomas. Thomas was confirmed....let Kavanaugh have his day. |
Wrong again!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/theres-precedent-for-merrick-garlands-supreme-court-snub/2017/04/06/02544902-197f-11e7-8598-9a99da559f9e_story.html?utm_term=.45586a7f2b3b |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
boggsman1
Joined: 24 Jun 2002
Posts: 9120
Location: at a computer
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mat-ty wrote: | | coboardhead wrote: | BTW, Matty. You are aware that there was a corroborating witness to Hill's testimony? Both the Democrats and the Repubs agreed not to call her. The bottom line was that Thomas would get the confirmation regardless.
So, are you saying the Libs are scum for fighting Thomas's confirmation or letting it happen? |
Complete scum, and no surprise you would defend them...
The garland situation was unique and the man was not accused of SEX CRIMES and would not have his name tarnished for life..... disgusting!!!!
Your opinion of Kavanaugh is beyond ignorant....Political Hack??????
Maybe you should do your homework and stop regurgitating left wing BS. |
Yes, hack... Take a look at his work on the Clinton Impeachment. WARNING: it requires reading. Kav insisted on releasing the gory details to the public, against Starr's better judgement....He also supported Dubya's pick of Harriet Meyers for SCOTUS!!! R U kidding me.... Kav is being nominated because he is quite political, and a huge ally to the Republican party if things get dicey next year for tRump.....
We can do better than a drunk preppy groper..... much better... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mat-ty
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 7850
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| boggsman1 wrote: | | mat-ty wrote: | | coboardhead wrote: | BTW, Matty. You are aware that there was a corroborating witness to Hill's testimony? Both the Democrats and the Repubs agreed not to call her. The bottom line was that Thomas would get the confirmation regardless.
So, are you saying the Libs are scum for fighting Thomas's confirmation or letting it happen? |
Complete scum, and no surprise you would defend them...
The garland situation was unique and the man was not accused of SEX CRIMES and would not have his name tarnished for life..... disgusting!!!!
Your opinion of Kavanaugh is beyond ignorant....Political Hack??????
Maybe you should do your homework and stop regurgitating left wing BS. |
Yes, hack... Take a look at his work on the Clinton Impeachment. WARNING: it requires reading. Kav insisted on releasing the gory details to the public, against Starr's better judgement....He also supported Dubya's pick of Harriet Meyers for SCOTUS!!! R U kidding me.... Kav is being nominated because he is quite political, and a huge ally to the Republican party if things get dicey next year for tRump.....
We can do better than a drunk preppy groper..... much better... |
Bottom line...the left could not hurt him in the nomination , vetting process so they resorted to sleaze ball banana republic tactics.
If he's as bad as you say why the gutter tactics????????
Are you seriously going to defend Clinton and his disgusting behavior? which was current at the time not 36 fucking years old... bad comparison.
And what nominee is not political????? Obamas two picks that met almost ZERO resistance are as far left as you can get. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|
Search
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Register
