View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mat-ty
Joined: 07 Jul 2007 Posts: 7850
|
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
let me see if I can help dumb old mac, he brags about his intellect but has the political IQ of a six year old... what did Fagen say? " you have been telling me you are a genius since you were seventeen, but in all the years I have known you , I still don't know what you mean"...
In a few days we will be less than 1 year away from the next election. In 8 weeks we will be in the election year. In other words, time is ticking fast for libtards, the longer this drags on the more it hurts them. If Dems had Trump dead to rights on impeachment they would have pulled the trigger already, but they don't, so instead they opt out for a clown show in hopes of damaging Trump...Not going to work morons, no crimes and no time. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 17747 Location: Berkeley, California
|
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mat-ty wrote: | Poor old crusty mac can't actually respond with any proof so he just attacks.....Read the transcript stupid, show were there is a quid pro quo..
Just like the Bogus Mueller investigation that you pushed harder than anyone....This will produce zero results, because nothing that even comes close to an impeachable offense happened......but keep enjoying the clown show you stupid old liberal piece of shit.....hahahahahahahahahaha |
Were you looking for the word “where”? Did i say that you show us how stupid and careless you are every day?
Testimony has made it clear that Trump’s ambassador told the new Ukraine President Zelensky that the nearly $400 million authorized by Congress had been blocked by the OMB at Trump’s direction, and wouldn’t be coming unless Zelensky dug up phony dirt on Hunter Biden. That happened with multiple communications by multiple Trump people well before the call—and OMB in fact had blocked the release of the money. Then the lawyers transferred the record of the call to a secure server to hide the evidence.
The transcript is damning on its face—and more than one person has testified that it was redacted to cover up some of the seamy details.
There are multiple crimes here, by different people, directed by Putin’s bitch, as a conspiracy to solicit foreign intervention in a US election and manufacture false evidence against a political opponent. The money was finally released after the whistleblower revealed the conspiracy and Lindsay Graham had a hissy fit. But that doesn’t mean that the extortion attempt was not a crime.
Watch the snow settle softly on the grave of Trump’s political career. Winter is here—and you’re eating frozen peanuts. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mat-ty
Joined: 07 Jul 2007 Posts: 7850
|
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You are beyond stupid old man. What testimony are you referring to????? I think you mean unchallenged or cross examined LEAKs meant to get stupid old fools like you all wet....... lol
Most level headed experts agree Trumps phone call does not even come close to being a crime...
But keep dreaming old man....How does it feel to be wrong so often?????
Winter is here ....too funny....how many times have you said that now you stupid old fool....100? 1000? hahahahahahahahahahah Mac the clown!!!
Last edited by mat-ty on Sat Nov 02, 2019 8:12 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nw30
Joined: 21 Dec 2008 Posts: 6485 Location: The eye of the universe, Cen. Cal. coast
|
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep "winter is here" and it's probably raining or snowing peanuts, mac has a thing about peanuts obviously, peanuts, peanuts, more peanuts, when he gets hung up on something he really gets hung up. Never mind that elephants LOVE peanuts, where as jack asses love eating alfalfa, so for mac, bring on the alfalfa! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14890 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mat-ty wrote: | You are beyond stupid old man. What testimony are you referring to????? I think you mean unchallenged or cross examined LEAKs meant to get stupid old fools like you all wet....... lol
Most level headed experts agree Trumps phone call does not even come close to being a crime...
But keep dreaming old man....How does it feel to be wrong so often?????
Winter is here ....too funny....how many times have you said that now you stupid old fool....100? 1000? hahahahahahahahahahah Mac the clown!!! |
idiot over what was it 1000 former and present prosecuters just from what Muleer did not conceal said he just be impeached/arrested. They put their names to it. lets see your fake list Moscow MADD-dy _________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mat-ty
Joined: 07 Jul 2007 Posts: 7850
|
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2019 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Trump raised more money in the past two weeks than Biden did in the first three quarter of the YEAR.....
You stupid un-hinged liberal morons.......hahahahahahahahah |
|
Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14890 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2019 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
mat-ty wrote: | Trump raised more money in the past two weeks than Biden did in the first three quarter of the YEAR.....
You stupid un-hinged liberal morons.......hahahahahahahahah |
He gave away 1 trillion dollars to other trust fund kids you moron.
and again of the USAs billionaires at least 9 out of 10 are right wingers you no to no level non-thinker.
And of corporation what 9 out of 10 are owned by right wingers. the larest in the USA what energy/gas, manufacturing, medical, insurance, defense, chemical, banking, and on and on , gee such liberals industries you idiot. _________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mac
Joined: 07 Mar 1999 Posts: 17747 Location: Berkeley, California
|
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2019 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mat-ty wrote: | You are beyond stupid old man. What testimony are you referring to????? I think you mean unchallenged or cross examined LEAKs meant to get stupid old fools like you all wet....... lol
Most level headed experts agree Trumps phone call does not even come close to being a crime...
But keep dreaming old man....How does it feel to be wrong so often?????
Winter is here ....too funny....how many times have you said that now you stupid old fool....100? 1000? hahahahahahahahahahah Mac the clown!!! |
Such an uninformed fool. Written statements--commonly called testimony--has been published from key witnesses documenting everything I wrote. If you only watch sources that agree with you, and particularly Fox, you wouldn't know this--and you would continue to make a fool of yourself.
Buy yourself a heavy coat for this winter. It will freeze your nuts right off. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mat-ty
Joined: 07 Jul 2007 Posts: 7850
|
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2019 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mac wrote: | mat-ty wrote: | You are beyond stupid old man. What testimony are you referring to????? I think you mean unchallenged or cross examined LEAKs meant to get stupid old fools like you all wet....... lol
Most level headed experts agree Trumps phone call does not even come close to being a crime...
But keep dreaming old man....How does it feel to be wrong so often?????
Winter is here ....too funny....how many times have you said that now you stupid old fool....100? 1000? hahahahahahahahahahah Mac the clown!!! |
Such an uninformed fool. Written statements--commonly called testimony--has been published from key witnesses documenting everything I wrote. If you only watch sources that agree with you, and particularly Fox, you wouldn't know this--and you would continue to make a fool of yourself.
Buy yourself a heavy coat for this winter. It will freeze your nuts right off. |
"Everything you wrote" in other word the unchallenged or cross examined selective leaks ? AKA a fucking joke like you.....
When the public sees these hearings it will be just like after they saw Mueller. OVER!!!!!!!
Poor old Mac and his dumb friends seem to forget a huge fact.....Even if Trump was asking for a Quid pro quo, which he was not....it is well within his rights as president, and commander and chief. He has the sole discretion on foreign policy.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
vientomas
Joined: 25 Apr 2000 Posts: 2343
|
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2019 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mat-ty wrote: | mac wrote: | mat-ty wrote: | You are beyond stupid old man. What testimony are you referring to????? I think you mean unchallenged or cross examined LEAKs meant to get stupid old fools like you all wet....... lol
Most level headed experts agree Trumps phone call does not even come close to being a crime...
But keep dreaming old man....How does it feel to be wrong so often?????
Winter is here ....too funny....how many times have you said that now you stupid old fool....100? 1000? hahahahahahahahahahah Mac the clown!!! |
Such an uninformed fool. Written statements--commonly called testimony--has been published from key witnesses documenting everything I wrote. If you only watch sources that agree with you, and particularly Fox, you wouldn't know this--and you would continue to make a fool of yourself.
Buy yourself a heavy coat for this winter. It will freeze your nuts right off. |
"Everything you wrote" in other word the unchallenged or cross examined selective leaks ? AKA a fucking joke like you.....
When the public sees these hearings it will be just like after they saw Mueller. OVER!!!!!!!
Poor old Mac and his dumb friends seem to forget a huge fact.....Even if Trump was asking for a Quid pro quo, which he was not....it is well within his rights as president, and commander and chief. He has the sole discretion on foreign policy.
|
By contrast, it seems OMB was likely using its formal power to delay the release of Defense Department aid. OMB appears to have extended the release timeline on these funds by revising an existing apportionment to add footnotes that effectively made the money legally unavailable until its release sometime around Sept. 11. As the Oct. 16 post pointed out, this apportionment process—including any applicable footnotes—is legally binding and is outlined in section 120 of OMB’s Circular A-11 document. Amb. William Taylor’s testimony revealed that after OMB had placed a hold on the aid, OMB asked the Defense Department to conduct an effectiveness study. The Defense Department completed the study one day after the OMB request and concluded that the aid would be effective. Yet, Taylor’s testimony asserts, OMB continued to hold the aid.
In this instance, if OMB was merely conducting a budget audit to ensure Ukrainian aid was appropriately apportioned, these actions would have been within its mandate. Furthermore, OMB would have had a plausible argument that the ICA, 2 U.S.C. 683(a), allows the office to delay the Defense Department’s aid in order to determine how it should be apportioned.
However, to date, there is no evidence that this was the reason for the delay. Perhaps some such evidence will emerge. But all of the information in the public realm thus far, including what Mulvaney said on Oct. 17, indicates that the reasons for the delay had nothing to do with a budget audit. Instead, the delay concerned, at most, pressure to get the Ukrainians to open an investigation in order to help the president politically, and possible policy concerns about corruption. On our reading of the relevant laws, this is not a valid basis for OMB to delay the release of funds.
On Sept. 27, the president signed into law a seven-week continuing resolution that included a provision extending the availability of the Defense Department’s unspent Ukraine funds. Because the life of the funds was extended, the White House avoided effectively rescinding appropriated funding without Congressional approval—which would have been a blatant impoundment violation under the relevant laws, including the ICA, the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act and the 2019 Appropriations Act. But it appears that OMB did not comply with relevant law when it delayed the release of the Defense Department’s $250 million in aid on grounds unrelated even to the permissible reasons for proposing such a delay under the ICA—budgetary contingencies, savings through greater efficiency or the need to meet the parameters of specific funding laws.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/more-role-omb-withholding-ukrainian-aid |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|