myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
Big Gov/Tech/Pharma are feeding us harmful medical BS
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 30, 31, 32  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935

PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hear, hear. Regarding "carrying water" ... the left makes no distinction between parroting someone else's opinions or proven facts and personally advocating for said opinions and facts. Even parroting both sides of an issue is carrying water and is somehow a license to attack. It has nothing to do with you or me and everything to do with them, whether it's AGW, Covid, windsurfing, or an individual politician.

mlaronde wrote:
Can we please understand what it really means to be an "Anti-Vaxxer"? It means someone like I, opposed to nearly ALL vaccines. It should not even apply to opponents of the clot-shots which technically are not even vaccines.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GURGLETROUSERS



Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 2643

PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's clearly a waste of effort when conspiracy people deliberately misrepresent what is claimed, but facts speak for themselves.

We KNOW that being vaccinated will not prevent us from infection, though it can partially delay it, as has already been explained on the other thread. What being fully vaccinated (three shots) WILL/DOES do is radically limit the seriousness of infection, especially from the most dangerous DELTA (still circulating) variant. it is pure deceit to attempt to disparage vaccination on the grounds that it is less effective against the far less serious OMICRON variant. (That is still being tweaked.)

The vast majority of seriously ill and dying patients in hospital, often from the more dangerous DELTA virus are UNVACCINATED! FACT! (How many times must this be restated?)

All this conspiracy stuff , and 'Happens to be the deadliest in history' (whatever the hell you are talking about) is irrelevant compared to the readily available facts of Covid deaths (Here in the U.K.) Just one factual statistic - Overall deaths from Covid 19 between 1 January and 31 October 2021 was 96% lower in people who had received two doses of vaccine. That was BEFORE the booster jab had become widespread, which has now saved many more, especially in the elderly age group.

You cling to your conspiracy nonsense (We will all die of heart attacks this year) while the rest of us fully vaccinated sheep look forward to the future.

Over and out on the subject.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swchandler



Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588

PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does isobars have a new buddy in mlaronde? Maybe in turn for carrying water on his anti-vaxx thing, he will jump aboard his bandwagon and provide needed backup and support. With mlaronde's earlier "girlie pants" comment, it could that he shares similar views regarding President Obama.

Then again, maybe mlaronde will stick tight to his anti-vaxx thing...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MikeLaRonde



Joined: 11 Jun 2001
Posts: 768

PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's a visual for anyone who doesn't understand why this is easily going to be the deadliest medicine in history. It already is for "vaccines", by orders of magnitude. For now, I'm guessing the drugs AZT and maybe even Remdesivir are still deadlier among all medications.

This is a graph of deaths actually reported to the USA VAERS system, under penalty of perjury, representing total deaths for all vaccines by year. It very easy to reproduce this data using the VAERS data portal so kindly provided to us by the CDC. This graph is slightly out of date, and the number, including foreign reports, is now over 20K. The number of reports from inside the USA is just about 10K.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swchandler



Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588

PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Could it be that folks died of Covid and not the vaccine? Since Covid vaccinations aren't a 100% protection against the disease, it's not surprising that some vaccinated folks died of Covid, particularly if they may have had other serious conditions affecting their health.

Under the circumstances ending with death, the vaccinated folks are numerically doing much better than the unvaccinated. More importantly, think about the vaccinated millions that are safely dodging Covid infection entirely or with minimal complications.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MikeLaRonde



Joined: 11 Jun 2001
Posts: 768

PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 7:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

swchandler wrote:
Could it be that folks died of Covid and not the vaccine? Since Covid vaccinations aren't a 100% protection against the disease, it's not surprising that some vaccinated folks died of Covid, particularly if they may have had other serious conditions affecting their health.

That could be, but only if you consider the total number of dead vaxxed, which must be in the hundreds of thousands.
Just to be clear, this number is not explicitly known, but is easily approximated by factoring all-cause mortality by vaccination rates.

And make no mistake, ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY is going to prove WAY higher for 2021. Not so much for 2020 over 2019, although it should be mentioned that ACM has been on the rise since '18, the supposed worst flu season ever (actually '19 was as bad, but we oddly didn't hear much about it)

The VAERS reports typically represent people who died within days of the shots, not those who died months later from heart attacks, stokes, blood clots etc.

In these cases, the causality was clear enough, if not obvious, that loved ones and/or healthcare providers found it necessary to make the entry (supposedly an arduous process talking 30 minutes), under penalty of perjury.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wsurfer



Joined: 17 Aug 2000
Posts: 1635

PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 12:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mlaronde wrote:
Here's a visual for anyone who doesn't understand why this is easily going to be the deadliest medicine in history. It already is for "vaccines", by orders of magnitude. For now, I'm guessing the drugs AZT and maybe even Remdesivir are still deadlier among all medications.

This is a graph of deaths actually reported to the USA VAERS system, under penalty of perjury, representing total deaths for all vaccines by year. It very easy to reproduce this data using the VAERS data portal so kindly provided to us by the CDC. This graph is slightly out of date, and the number, including foreign reports, is now over 20K. The number of reports from inside the USA is just about 10K.


Misleading graph at best. How many vaccinations (of any type) were administered in the previous years before the various Covid Vaccines.

I created a entry on VAERS when I got a case of COVID arm after my second shot.

"Anyone can report an adverse event to VAERS. Healthcare professionals are required to report certain adverse events and vaccine manufacturers are required to report all adverse events that come to their attention.

VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on individuals to send in reports of their experiences to CDC and FDA. VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused a health problem, but is especially useful for detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse event reporting that might indicate a possible safety problem with a vaccine. This way, VAERS can provide CDC and FDA with valuable information that additional work and evaluation is necessary to further assess a possible safety concern."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
techno900



Joined: 28 Mar 2001
Posts: 4161

PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

All very interesting, but here is the way I see it.

1. No vaccination = risk of covid (21%) and possibly death for a small percentage (.26%).

2. Get vaccinated with all three shots = a possibility of an adverse reaction and for a very, very small percentage, death. But, the chances of a bad case of covid or death from covid is greatly reduced compared to the unvaccinated.

3. My logical deduction is that the risk of an adverse or deadly reaction from the vaccination is FAR less than catching covid and possibly dying from the virus.

4. Every medical treatment or vaccination has risks, but with due diligence, consumers can judge when treatments (or the type of treatment) offer advantages over non treatments.

However, it’s reasonable to be a skeptic when the government is selling covid vaccinations because I believe that they do not share all the data regarding the potential negatives, or if they do, they under sell it so as not to discourage the minions from choosing vaccination.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vientomas



Joined: 25 Apr 2000
Posts: 2343

PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you have any objective data to support your belief? If not, you know what opinions are like...everybody has one!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swchandler



Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588

PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

techno900, it seems that you are leaving an important concern out of your comments. How do we view and treat those that refuse to be vaccinated. Do you favor protective restrictions, and do you feel that mandatory testing should be required in employment, schooling and societal activities for the unvaccinated? Also, regarding restrictions, they could be governmental or private in origin. Would government (federal, state or local) restrictions be acceptable?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 30, 31, 32  Next
Page 5 of 32

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group