myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
Lets follow the money.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 44, 45, 46, 47  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14836
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2022 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

as usual from supreme court idiots with citizens united where anyone can give unlimited money in campaigns including corporations, ie dark money.


well again we see the devils who still want it ...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-senators-vote-to-block-a-bill-requiring-dark-money-groups-to-disclose-their-donors-i-don-t-want-to-see-them-doxxed/ar-AA1286kC?cvid=e6b07a01e5904055d5ded6913b353da5&ocid=winp2sv1plustaskbarhover


Republican senators vote to block a bill requiring dark-money groups to disclose their donors: 'I don't want to see them doxed'


Quote:
Republican senators on Thursday voted to block a bill that would have required so-called dark money groups to disclose their donors, hindering Democrats' efforts to increase transparency in elections.

The Democracy Is Strengthened by Casting Light On Spending in Elections (DISCLOSE) Act targets political nonprofit groups and super PACs, requiring them to reveal donors who have contributed more than $10,000 during an election cycle. The measure also applies to groups that spend money on ads supporting or opposing judicial nominees.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14836
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2022 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

another billionaire ultra partisan right winger caught lobbying for a foreign country and not registering as a chinese lobbyist.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/former-wynn-resorts-ceo-may-face-trial-in-foreign-lobbying-case/ar-AA12k06I?ocid=winp2sv1plustaskbarhover&cvid=62cab3372db44976a9684e35a2c2c807

Former Wynn Resorts CEO May Face Trial in Foreign Lobbying Case


Quote:

(Bloomberg) -- Former Wynn Resorts Ltd. Chief Executive officer Stephen Wynn may face trial in a lawsuit brought by the government to compel him to register as a Chinese lobbyist.

Billionaire Steve Wynn, chairman and chief executive officer of Wynn Resorts Ltd., speaks during the Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California, U.S., on Wednesday, May 3, 2017. The conference is a unique setting that convenes individuals with the capital, power and influence to move the world forward meet face-to-face with those whose expertise and creativity are reinventing industry, philanthropy and media.
The parties are unlikely to reach a settlement, according to a Tuesday filing in US District Court in Washington.

The government sued Wynn in May to compel him to register as a Chinese agent. Wynn has argued he wasn’t lobbying when he told the Trump administration that China wanted the US to extradite Guo Wengui, an exile who criticized the Chinese government. The government’s civil case marks the first Foreign Agents Registration Act lawsuit by the Justice Department in more than 30 years.

In its lawsuit, the government claimed that Wynn was acting to protect his casinos in Macau when he told former President Donald Trump about China’s position on Guo, as well as White House and National Security Council officials.

Wynn’s lawyers argued that he passed along the message from Sun Lijun, then-Vice Minister of China’s Ministry of Public Security, as a diplomatic offer and that he was “fully transparent in his dealings with the Trump Administration.” The Trump Administration rejected the offer.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14836
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2022 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

just another billionaire for right wingers

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/realestate/marc-andreessen-compares-california-to-rome-circa-250-a-d/ar-AA12BlL0?ocid=winp2sv1plustaskbar&cvid=cc0e4c9820034fac9b1b98b39b01e06f



Marc Andreessen Compares California to Rome Circa 250 A.D.



(Bloomberg) -- Billionaire venture capitalist Marc Andreessen said he decided to “double down on California” and stay in the state, even as he likened it to “living in the ruins of a once great civilization.”[/quote]

https://www.quora.com/Why-does-Marc-Andreessen-give-so-much-money-to-Republicans

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14836
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 10:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/trump-officials-removed-2-7-million-ppp-fraud-flags-from-the-largest-corporations-during-his-lame-duck-period/ar-AA12HBsG?ocid=winp2sv1plustaskbarmouseenter&cvid=9823546a1d784668b5db4de61f8bd17a


Trump officials removed '2.7 million' PPP fraud flags from 'the largest corporations' during his lame duck period


Quote:

The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), which was part of the CARES Act of 2020, was launched under former President Donald Trump in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and continued into the Joe Biden era. Some PPP loans were investigated by federal officials and flagged for potential fraud. But according to a Project on Government Oversight (POGO) report released on Thursday, October 6, the Trump Administration eliminated an abundance of flags during its final weeks in office.

Truthout’s Sharon Zhang reports that according to POGO’s report, Small Business Administration (SBA) officials “eliminated 2.7 million flags between December 2020 and January 2021, as the Administration was in its lame duck period.”

In an article published on October 6, Zhang notes, “Special preference was given to the largest loans, which often also went to the largest corporations. On January 16, 2021, four days before President Joe Biden’s inauguration, Trump’s SBA wiped 99 percent of special review flags — which were given out to every loan above $2 million for separate investigatory purposes.”

READ MORE: How looters who abused the Paycheck Protection Program pulled off the 'biggest fraud in a generation': report

Related video: Joliet PD: 25 people identified for PPP fraud, some applying for the money while in jail

Today, Joliet police identified 25 people who they say tried to get
Play
Current Time 0:25
/

Zhang notes that according to POGO, the Trump Administration “appeared to have favored the very largest loan recipients.”


“Trump continually gave huge financial favors to large corporations during his time in office — and though most large corporations were exempt from receiving PPP loans, some large corporations managed to skirt the rules and receive loans anyway,” Zhang observes. “Out of the $800 billion given out in the program, flagged loans accounted for at least $189 billion. Because the vast majority of PPP loans — 95 percent — have been forgiven, it’s likely that many of these loans that had previously been flagged have been forgiven entirely.”

Zhang points out that a National Bureau of Economic Research study released in January 2022 “estimated that only between about a quarter and a third of PPP loans went to saving workers’ jobs.”

“The rest — about 66 to 77 percent — went to business owners and people like shareholders,” Zhang reports. “Many loans went directly to the rich. Several billionaires or companies owned by billionaires received loans, like Republican fundraiser Joe Farrell or Kanye West’s apparel company, valued at $3 billion. One loan, POGO found, went to a hotel owned by West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice, a Republican who is the richest man in the state and a former billionaire.”

READ MORE:White House shreds Marjorie Taylor Greene over PPP loan hypocrisy

Zhang adds, “The loan was worth $8.9 million and appeared to have been flagged eight times by the SBA. Another loan with nine flags, worth over $5 million, appears to belong to a Kentucky hospitality corporation whose annual revenue of $850 million would likely make it too large to receive a PPP loan.”

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.


Last edited by real-human on Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:07 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14836
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2022 2:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pretty much we can see the instability right after trump was out of office and committing treason with his friends look at this date trump tweeted about SA and his friend Putin and how happy he was they were jacking the oil prices up. I believe as he wanted to charge Kerry with a crime, this is certainly worse. I believe this to be treason.

https://www.rawstory.com/saudi-arabia-oil/?cx_testId=4&cx_testVariant=cx_undefined&cx_artPos=9&cx_experienceId=EXC93HV4HK4I#cxrecs_s

Saudi Arabia's oil price hike is 'election interference' designed to hurt Democrats: experts


Quote:

In a move White House officials called a "hostile act," Saudi Arabia slashed oil production by 2 million barrels a day with around just a month to go before the U.S. midterms. Now, the Biden administration says it will be "re-evaluating" its relationship with the Saudis.


According to The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein, the reaction was a public sign of disappointment from U.S. officials rarely directed towards the Saudi Kingdom.

Experts speaking to The Intercept say the Saudis' move wasn't just geopolitical -- it was an effort to influence U.S. politics.

“The Saudis are working to get Trump re-elected and for the MAGA Republicans to win the midterms,” Bruce Riedel, a senior fellow of the Brookings Institution, told The Intercept. “Higher oil prices will undermine the Democrats.”


https://theintercept.com/2022/10/11/mbs-saudi-oil-biden-october-surprise-election-interference/

“ELECTION INTERFERENCE”: OIL PRICE HIKE IS SAUDI ARABIA’S OCTOBER SURPRISE AGAINST BIDEN


Quote:
WHEN, JUST ONE month before midterm elections, Saudi Arabia announced it would be slashing oil production by 2 million barrels a day, White House officials called it a “hostile act” and said the administration was “reevaluating” the Saudi relationship. It was the kind of bellicose language officialdom virtually never uses to describe the oil-rich monarchy, whose vast wealth has bought it enormous influence in Washington.

Congressional Democrats facing reelection amid soaring gas prices were similarly incensed. Usually, Capitol Hill will trot out bloodless language of “deep concern” in response to the kingdom’s myriad human rights abuses, but this time congressional Democrats struck back, vowing to block weapons sales and even taking the unprecedented step of introducing legislation to withdraw U.S. troops from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The bill’s sponsors linked their efforts to the war in Ukraine, pointing out how keeping oil prices high results in a windfall of profit to bankroll Russian President Vladimir Putin’s bloody invasion.

“There’s no doubt that the Saudi-led OPEC oil production cuts are a strategic effort to hurt Americans at the pump.”
Yet experts pointed to the price hikes as more than a geopolitical move. They said it was also a foray by Saudi’s de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, or MBS, into U.S. electoral politics: a move by the Saudi-dominated oil cartel OPEC against President Joe Biden and in favor of Donald Trump.

“The Saudis are working to get Trump reelected and for the MAGA Republicans to win the midterms,” Bruce Riedel, a senior fellow of the Brookings Institution, told The Intercept. “Higher oil prices will undermine the Democrats.”

Oil prices affect not just the price at the pump but also the cost of virtually everything in our fossil fuel-dependent economy — and are a major driver of inflation. “There’s no doubt that the Saudi-led OPEC oil production cuts are a strategic effort to hurt Americans at the pump and undermine our work to tackle rising costs,” said Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., in an email.


MBS’s affinity for Trump is hardly a secret. Trump broke with presidential tradition by paying his first foreign visit to Saudi Arabia’s capital, where he inked a record $350 billion weapons sale to the autocracy. He also repeatedly defended MBS amid reporting, including by his own CIA, that the crown prince had ordered the murder of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi. “I saved his ass,” Trump reportedly said. “I was able to get Congress to leave him alone” — referring to three times he vetoed congressional resolutions blocking billions in weapons sales to the Saudis.

U.S. President Donald Trump, top, walks past Mohammed Bin Salman, Saudi Arabia's crown prince, bottom, as he arrives for a session at the Group of 20 (G-20) summit in Osaka, Japan, on Saturday, June 29, 2019. Disputes over wording on climate change and trade are unresolved shortly before Group of 20 leaders are due to release a communique from their summit in Japan, raising the risk of a very watered-down document or no statement at all. Photographer: Kazuhiro Nogi/Pool via BloombergPresident Donald Trump walks past Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Arabia’s crown prince, in Osaka, Japan, on June 29, 2019. Photo: Kazuhiro Nogi/Bloomberg via Getty Images
The cozy relationship between Trump’s circles and the Saudis persisted after the president left office. Just six months after leaving the White House, Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and former top White House adviser, won a $2 billion investment from the Saudi sovereign wealth fund at the request of MBS, who overrode the objections of Saudi officials. Kushner would later flaunt his influence with the Saudis in a pitch to investors for his investment firm Affinity Partners, according to a pitch deck obtained by The Intercept in April. And Trump’s Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s firm, Liberty Strategic Capital, raised $1 billion from the Saudi sovereign wealth fund.

MOST READ

Mehmet Oz Campaign Misled Reporters About His Emotional Encounter With a Black Voter
Robert Mackey

Trump’s Bad Week May Hasten His Ruin — or Simply Stoke His Hubris
James Risen

The Right’s Anti-Vaxxers Are Killing Republicans
James Risen
EXPERTS SUGGEST THAT MBS’s oil production cut is a targeted attempt to hurt the Democrats’ electoral prospects. “This is MBS’s October surprise,” said Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. “This is his election interference. It forces Biden to make a choice: Will he protect America’s democracy and Democratic lawmakers in Congress, or will he triple down on a flawed gamble that says that the U.S. has no choice but to acquiesce to Saudi Arabia to prevent Riyadh from aligning with Russia?”

Khalid Aljabri — son of Saudi Arabia’s former intelligence chief, Saad Aljabri, and a frequent commentator on Saudi affairs — also made the comparison to the October Surprise: a term for a late-in-the-game, election-swinging event coined during Ronald Reagan’s successful bid to unseat Jimmy Carter. Aljabri said, “Emboldened by Biden’s no-consequence policy and empty campaign rhetoric, MBS wants to make a Carter out of Biden with OPEC’s October surprise, knowing that high gas prices and inflation influence domestic U.S. politics.”

In many ways, MBS’s decision to tamp down oil production is a rebuke to Biden’s controversial meeting with the crown prince in Jeddah this summer in which the two shared a fist bump. The meeting — following secret backchanneling with Riyadh by CIA Director William Burns, in which oil was discussed — flew in the face of Biden’s campaign promise to make Saudi Arabia a “pariah.”

“This is MBS’s October surprise. This is his election interference.”
There were several early signs that the meeting wouldn’t lead to the diplomatic thaw that the administration had hoped for. When Biden touched down in Jeddah, he was greeted not by a top official but by a provincial governor — a major diplomatic snub. And within minutes of the meeting between Biden and MBS, Saudi officials were leaking to the media, disputing Biden’s claim to have brought up Khashoggi.

The failure of the meeting to repair relations created tension between the White House and congressional Democrats, who feel as though the oil production cuts leave them vulnerable in the upcoming election and that the administration isn’t doing enough to compel Saudi Arabia to restore production.

Sources close to the administration, who asked for anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly, blame Biden’s Saudi visit on his Middle East coordinator on the National Security Council, Brett McGurk. The personification of Washington’s foreign policy consensus, impervious to change, McGurk has served in every administration since President George W. Bush as an unwavering advocate of cozier relations with Riyadh.

“President Biden has been getting bad advice on Middle East policy for a long time, and this OPEC decision is really a predictable failure of his trip to the region this summer,” a Democratic House Foreign Affairs Committee staffer told The Intercept. “The president is getting bad advice from McGurk and others, and this should be a wakeup call. It would be negligent not to make any changes at the NSC.”

Rights advocates working on the Middle East echoed the calls for a shakeup at NSC. “It’s no secret that Biden’s Middle East advisor Brett McGurk was the principal champion for pushing Biden to capitulate to Saudi and UAE — on arms sales, on U.S. forces and weapons in their countries, and of course meeting with MBS directly, on the fiction that they would serve US interests,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, the executive director of DAWN, the pro-democracy group founded by Jamal Khashoggi. “It’s clearer now more than ever that this was just really bad advice because all this capitulation has secured nothing other than Biden’s global humiliation.”

Making a Killing
Read Our Complete Coverage
Making a Killing
Democrats have several policy tools they can use to compel Saudi Arabia to back off the production cuts. On Monday, Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., chair of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said that he would use his power to block all weapons sales to Saudi Arabia going forward.

While Menendez has called on the Biden administration to suspend all U.S. cooperation with the Saudis, the administration has only said vaguely that it would reevaluate the relationship. Responding to congressional Democrats’ calls to block military support to Saudi Arabia, the State Department made clear that it would not do so. Instead, the Biden administration is reportedly discussing canceling an upcoming meeting in Riyadh concerning air and missile defense cooperation.

“I think that’s barely a slap on the wrist,” a source close to the administration said, pointing out that MBS and even many high-level officials weren’t going to be attending the meeting. “Them skipping out on this meeting is not going to cause MBS to lose sleep.”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14836
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hey right wingers why do you support dark maney.... because you are all for moneyed corporations and kings controlling the USA.... Remeber just ONE country gave trump party planner in 20126 1.5 Billion dollars to make sure trump would win. Now another oil hating country had given trumps baby 2 billion and his sec 1 billion and this artilcle is talking aboutwhat they could find a measly 1 billion of dark money when they have no clue.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/dark-money-groups-have-pumped-1-billion-into-gop-campaigns-to-recapture-senate/ar-AA13hNtN?cvid=4684c0ec9bd2475d90ac75191f78e548&ocid=winp2sv1plustaskbarhover

Dark money groups have pumped $1 billion into GOP campaigns to recapture Senate


Quote:
Republican U.S. Senate candidate Mehmet Oz and Democratic Senate candidate Lt. Gov. John Fetterman Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images

Shadowy organizations that are legally allowed to hide their donors have pumped nearly $1 billion into the Republican Party's effort to retake the U.S. Senate, according to an NPR analysis released Saturday.

In total, NPR found that "more than $1.6 billion has been spent or booked on TV ads in a dozen Senate races, with $3 out of every $4 being spent in six states — Georgia, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, Nevada and Ohio."

"Most of that money is coming from dark money outside groups with little-to-no donor transparency — and Republicans are getting a huge boost from them," the outlet reported.


Nearly 90% of the money spent on pro-Republican television ads this midterm cycle has been from dark money groups, according to NPR's analysis of ad data. By comparison, 55% of spending on ads boosting Democrats has come from dark money organizations, which have exploded in number and influence since the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United decision.

Predictably, key battleground states such as Georgia, Pennsylvania and Arizona have drawn massive ad spending from outside groups in recent months, as Senate races in those states tighten with just over two weeks until the November midterms.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14836
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 9:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

put the CEO in jail...

https://www.newsweek.com/facebook-hit-25-million-fines-breaking-washington-election-law-1755012


U.S.
Facebook Hit with $25 Million in Fines for Breaking Washington Election Law


Quote:

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, was issued a nearly $25 million fine on Wednesday for violating the state of Washington's campaign finance laws.

Meta was found to be in violation of Washington's political disclosure law 822 separate times between 2019 and 2021, according to court documents. King County Superior Court Judge Douglass North issued the maximum possible fine for each instance, totaling up to $30,000 per violation.

Washington's election transparency laws require ad sellers like Meta to "disclose the names and addresses of political buys, the targets of such ads and the total number of viewers of each ad," according to a report from The Seattle Times. North found that Meta had intentionally violated the standards, which have been in place since 1972.



Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson, who originally brought the case against Meta, said in the report from the Times that he had "one word for Facebook's conduct in this case – arrogance."

"It intentionally disregarded Washington's election transparency laws," Ferguson said. "But that wasn't enough. Facebook argued in court that those laws should be declared unconstitutional. That's breathtaking."


Along with paying the fines, Meta was ordered in the suit to "come into full compliance" with the state's election transparency laws within the next 30 days. The court also demanded that an authorized person from Meta file a sworn certificate in 30 days stating that Meta followed the injunction.

The company is also ordered to pay the attorney's fees in the case, which Ferguson has requested be tripled for a total of $10.5 million, reported the Times. North will decide the final total of the attorney's fees at a later date.

NEWSWEEK SUBSCRIPTION OFFERS >
Ferguson first sued Meta for violation of transparency laws in 2018 for a total of $200,000. Meta, still known at the time as Facebook, said they would stop selling political ads in the state of Washington rather than comply with the law, reported the Times.

Ferguson filed a second lawsuit against Meta in 2020 after a report found that the company was continuing to sell political ads out of compliance with the state regulations.

Ferguson wrote in a motion filed in July that Meta had failed to respond to several inspection requests regarding Washington political advertisements on its social media platform between 2019 and 2021.




Meta also filed a motion earlier this spring asking the court to strike down the regulations for commercial advertisers. The Times reported that the social media giant had the laws "unduly burden political speech" and were "virtually impossible to comply with." North denied Meta's request in September.

Newsweek reached out to Meta's press team for comment.

Update 10/26/22, 9:25 p.m. ET: This article was updated with additional information and background.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20935

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Speaking of following the money, you'd better hope PayPal doesn't have any of yours. They admitted in writing to me years ago that it's against their policy to close out an account or pay out any cash they hold.

Now it's gotten much worse. Their policy for over a year now has been the following: If THEY decide some entity (mostly organizations or journalists ... so far) has spread misinformation, PP can and will seize (aka steal) -- and have seized (aka stolen) -- $2,500 from offenders' accounts. In many cases they have managed to freeze the bank accounts of such people and/or organizations.

Thousands of pages of documented evidence prove that the social media, at the direction of the U.S. government, censor our news freely. The most glaring example is the censorship by the FBI of the Biden family corruption laid out in great detail on Hunter's laptop. (In case the intended purpose and effect of that crime escapes you, voter polls show that it swung the 2020 election.) Many of you approve of that, but will you sit still when facts prove yet again that most of the left's blather is misinformation and PP confiscates $2,500 from YOU?

I tried to copy and paste from my computer screen a well-referenced article about this problem, but it was literally uncopyable. I had to resort to the screenshot you see below. Your government and Big Tech, usually proven to be in collusion, are already and openly interfering THAT much with the news you are allowed to see, especially in the social media most Americans get their "news" from. Thank God for Elon Musk and his willingness to spend $45B of his own money to support the First Amendment.

How did I close my PP account and get my money out after after they refused to do either? I refused to give them my cell phone number. They huffed and puffed and demanded that I give it to them or else they would close my account. I have since verified by telephone and email that they have no record of any account with me.

Here's the tip of the iceberg:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swchandler



Joined: 08 Nov 1993
Posts: 10588

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

isobars, I have to admit that you seem have problems like no one else. On top of that, you are forced to accept the results of a stolen election and government and "Big Tech" censorship of everything that you hold dear.

You know, I think that I can hear the sad sound of violins in the background.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17742
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 8:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Follow the money indeed. Grifter Mercola lrading Isobars around by the nose.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 44, 45, 46, 47  Next
Page 45 of 47

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group