myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
alan dershowitz why defend a serial pedophile
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14834
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

epstein had to be blackmailing this creep... you do not turn over your finances to a unknown .... but such a good smokescreen to hide the payoffs... where right winger pediophile longest right winger speaker of the house was caught with un-explained payoffs. this way wexler who give epstein a manhatted house worth 100 million could claim he was a victim ... BS... you could have filed to get the property back in 30 years.

https://www.businessinsider.com/les-wexner-documents-ordered-unsealed-epstein-related-case-2020-8?r=MX&IR=T

Les Wexner, the billionaire founder of Victoria's Secret's parent company, may be forced to share more about his ties to Jeffrey Epstein


Quote:
According to court filings in the Southern District of New York, Wexner has not turned over documents requested in a defamation case between Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre and Epstein's former lawyer Alan Dershowitz.



Quote:
Les Wexner, the billionaire founder and former CEO of Victoria's Secret parent L Brands, has largely stayed quiet on his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the late convicted sex offender.

Epstein managed Wexner's finances, reportedly beginning in the 1980s, and was at one point granted power of attorney over Wexner's legal and financial matters.

Wexner may be forced to share more details as US District Judge Lorette Preska called for the unsealing of correspondence on Monday between Wexner and lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who once defended Epstein in court.

According to court filings in the Southern District of New York, Wexner has not turned over documents that Dershowitz requested to bolster his suit against Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre, who has said that Epstein trafficked her to men including Dershowitz and the UK's Prince Andrew.


Dershowitz has denied the allegations, and he and Giuffre are currently entangled in defamation complaints against each other.

On Monday, Preska said that "the Court sees no reason for that correspondence to remain under seal" and that a hearing would be scheduled for August 17 to decide whether Wexner should be compelled to testify in Giuffre's defamation case against Dershowitz.

Wexner stepped down from his post as L Brands' CEO in February, after nearly six decades leading the company he founded.

After Epstein was arrested in July 2019, a representative for Wexner said the retail executive had severed ties with Epstein more than a decade earlier. L Brands subsequently hired outside legal counsel to investigate the company's own ties to Epstein following reports that Epstein had used his connection to Wexner as a way to coerce women and girls into performing sexual acts, promising them modeling jobs.


In a letter to his foundation last August, Wexner condemned his former financial advisor's alleged behavior. At the time, Wexner also noted that Epstein had "misappropriated vast sums of money" from him and his family.

"I am embarrassed that, like so many others, I was deceived by Mr. Epstein," Wexner wrote in the letter. "I know now that my trust in him was grossly misplaced and I deeply regret having ever crossed his path."

Epstein died by suicide in a Manhattan jail cell in August 2019.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14834
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2021 10:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

this despicable pig helping another child sicko preditor to get off.... WTF... dirt is such a scumbag and shouuld spend the rest of his life in sing sing. please biden ake up that girls case and put him on trial.

again no human defends pedophiles like Epstein or prosecutor lets one off that had hundreds of suspected cases. You just do not represent scum of the earth like that unless a judge orders you to.

Same with helping Nader in any capacity much less presidental release.

https://news.yahoo.com/using-connections-trump-dershowitz-became-132641723.html


Using Connections to Trump, Dershowitz Became Force in Clemency Grants


Quote:
WASHINGTON By the time George Nader pleaded guilty last year to possessing child pornography and sex trafficking a minor, his once strong alliances in President Donald Trumps inner circle had been eroded by his cooperation with the special counsels investigation into Trumps team and its connections to Russia.

So as Nader sought to fight the charges and reduce his potential prison time, he turned to a lawyer with a deep reservoir of goodwill with the president and a penchant for taking unpopular, headline-grabbing cases: Alan Dershowitz.

Dershowitz told Naders allies that he had reached out to an official in the Trump administration and one in the Israeli government to try to assess whether they would support a plan for Nader to be freed from U.S. custody in order to resume a behind-the-scenes role in Middle East peace talks, and whether Trump might consider commuting his 10-year sentence.

Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times

Dershowitz helped craft a proposal which Naders allies believed he was floating at the White House in the final days of the Trump presidency for Nader to immediately self-deport after his release from a Virginia jail. Under the plan, Nader would board a private plane provided by the United Arab Emirates to return to the Gulf state, where he holds citizenship and has served as a close adviser to the powerful crown prince.

Given the nature of Naders crimes and his cooperation with the Russia investigation, his bid for clemency was a long shot that did not work out. But Dershowitzs willingness to pull a range of levers to try to free him shows why he emerged as a highly sought-after and often influential intermediary as Trump decided who would benefit from his pardon powers.

Many of Dershowitzs clients got what they wanted before Trump left office, an examination by The New York Times found. The lawyer played a role in at least 12 clemency grants, including two pardons, which wipe out convictions, and 10 commutations, which reduce prison sentences, while also helping to win a temporary reprieve from sanctions for an Israeli mining billionaire.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14834
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2021 7:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the lame interviewer again not asking why he a rich lawyer would defend the worst child pedophiles in us history. that taking money for services from such a despicable/deplorable not human person is not accepted in this world we live in from such a monster.

so we know why you defended him because he had the goods on ya... this girl is telling the truth...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/attorney-alan-dershowitz-fuming-over-sexual-misconduct-claims/vi-AANyupp?ocid=msedgntp


Attorney Alan Dershowitz Fuming Over Sexual Misconduct Claims


Quote:
Alan Dershowitz and his wife Carolyn, spoke with Inside Edition, saying a woman's sexual misconduct claims are a complete lie.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14834
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2022 1:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/judge-sanctions-kari-lake-s-legal-team-which-includes-alan-dershowitz-for-recklessly-filing-false-misleading-and-unsupported-claims-in-election-lawsuit/ar-AA14NX7A?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=411478e66f5f49c3b0023300f377bf18

Judge Sanctions Kari Lake’s Legal Team, Which Includes Alan Dershowitz, for ‘Recklessly’ Filing ‘False, Misleading, and Unsupported’ Claims in Election Lawsuit


Quote:
Kari Lake appears in a November 2020 YouTube screengrab. Alan Dershowitz was photographed near the Capitol on Jan. 29, 2020 in Washington, DC.

An Arizona-based federal judge has ordered sanctions against the legal team assembled by gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake (R) and another plaintiff in a failed lawsuit against winning opponent Katie Hobbs (D) and other defendants from two Arizona county government boards.

The attorneys being sanctioned are not directly named in Thursday’s order, but according to the court docket, Harvard Law School Prof. Alan Dershowitz is Lake’s lead attorney in the matter. Also on her legal team are co-lead attorneys Andrew D. Parker, Jesse Hersch Kibort, and Joseph Alan Pull of Minneapolis. Further listed as a member of her legal team is attorney Kurt B. Olsen of Washington, D.C.

Parker, Olsen, and Dershowitz signed the original complaint, an amended complaint, and a opposition to a request for sanctions.

Those attorneys are presumably the ones sanctioned on Thursday for filing a complaint by Lake and Arizona State Representative Mark Finchem (R-11), another plaintiff.

The same legal team represented both plaintiffs, the docket indicates.

The Lake/Finchem lawsuit sought to question the Grand Canyon State’s use of electronic ballot-counting devices:

This is a civil rights action for declaratory and injunctive relief to prohibit the use of electronic voting machines in the State of Arizona in the upcoming 2022 Midterm Election, slated to be held on November 8, 2022 (the “Midterm Election”), unless and until the electronic voting system is made open to the public and subjected to scientific analysis by objective experts to determine whether it is secure from manipulation or intrusion. The machine companies have consistently refused to do this.

Plaintiffs have a constitutional and statutory right to have their ballots, and all ballots cast together with theirs, counted accurately and transparently, so that only legal votes determine the winners of each office contested in the Midterm Election. Electronic voting machines cannot be deemed reliably secure and do not meet the constitutional and statutory mandates to guarantee a free and fair election. The use of untested and unverified electronic voting machines violates the rights of Plaintiffs and their fellow voters and office seekers, and it undermines public confidence in the validity of election results. Just as the government cannot insist on “trust me,” so too, private companies that perform governmental functions, such as vote counting, cannot be trusted without verification.

The lawsuit elsewhere bemoaned what it called “glaring failures with electronic voting systems” and alleged that “[m]ost” voting “machines are over a decade old, have critical components manufactured overseas in countries, some of which are hostile to the United States, and use software that is woefully outdated and vulnerable to catastrophic cyberattacks.”

Incredible toothbrush is all the rage in Mexico
Ad
Teeth Care
Incredible toothbrush is all the rage in Mexico
Hobbs was sued in her capacity “as Arizona Secretary of State and the chief election officer in Arizona.” Other named defendants besides Hobbs included individual members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the Pima County Board of Supervisors.

U.S. District Judge John J. Tuchi rubbished the lawsuit in August and on Thursday ascertained that sanctions were appropriate.

Tuchi, a Barack Obama appointee, noted in August that Arizona election equipment is rigorously tested before it is used to count votes.

“Before a single vote is cast, Arizona’s election equipment undergoes thorough testing by independent, neutral experts. Electronic voting equipment must be tested by both the Secretary’s Certification Committee and an Election Assistance Commission (“EAC”) accredited testing laboratory before it may be used in an Arizona election,” Judge Tuchi noted, citing various state laws and noting the specific firms which conducted the independent tests.

He continued:

In addition to the equipment certification process, Arizona’s vote tabulation results are subject to four independent audits — two audits occur before the election, and two audits after. The first of these audits is a logic and accuracy test, which is performed by the Arizona Secretary of State on a sample of the tabulation equipment.

[ . . . ]

The second required audit also takes place before election day. For the second audit, Arizona counties must perform a logic and accuracy test on all of their tabulation equipment. (Citation omitted.) In 2020, the second Maricopa County audit also took place on October 6, and the tabulators counted the ballots with 100% accuracy.

Related video: Refusing to Concede, Arizona’s Kari Lake Indicates She’s Preparing for Legal Fight

Play
Current Time 0:08
/
Duration 1:07
HQ
CaptionsFullscreen
Refusing to Concede, Arizona’s Kari Lake Indicates She’s Preparing for Legal Fight
Unmute
0
View on Watch
More videos
Kari Lake | Kari Lake Loses Bid To Become Arizona Governor | US Midterms Elections Results | News18/6:54
Kari Lake | Kari Lake Loses Bid To Become Arizona Governor | US Midterms Elections Results | News18
News18/News18
Kari Lake leans into bogus fraud claims in Arizona; risks stoking extremist violence/6:22
Kari Lake leans into bogus fraud claims in Arizona; risks stoking extremist violence
MSNBC/MSNBC
The third audit is a post-election hand count, the judge said. The fourth is a “post-election logic and accuracy test[] performed by the counties.”

A recitation of how the system was supposed to work was provided not just to buttress the opinion that Lake’s lawsuit was unwarranted — it was also used to cite the state-level nature of elections processes.

Judge Tuchi ruled that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue because her claims were “too speculative to establish an injury in fact.” And, even if the plaintiffs did have standing, the judge ruled that the 11th Amendment barred their claims because the core of the dispute arose under state law, not federal law, and therefore did not belong in federal court.

“Because the Constitution charges states with administering elections, Plaintiffs’ claims can only stem from an argument that Defendants are violating state law by using what Plaintiffs allege are insecure or inaccurate voting systems,” the judge wrote in August.

With the lawsuit dismissed, the judge addressed a request for sanctions on Thursdsay, Dec. 1. In a 30-page order, he wrote as follows:

The Court concludes that sanctions are warranted under Rule 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. It finds that Plaintiffs made false, misleading, and unsupported factual assertions in their FAC and MPI and that their claims for relief did not have an adequate factual or legal basis grounded in a reasonable pre-filing inquiry, in violation of Rules 11(b)(2) and (b)(3). The Court further finds that Plaintiffs’ counsel acted at least recklessly in unreasonably and vexatiously multiplying the proceedings by seeking a preliminary injunction based on Plaintiffs’ frivolous claims, in violation of Section 1927.

Judge Tuchi wrote that only the attorneys — not the plaintiffs themselves — would be sanctioned, though he noted that the plaintiffs acted “far” from “appropriately” in the matter.

“Here, while there are reasons to believe that Plaintiffs themselves contributed to the violations of Rule 11(b)(3) in this case — including that they themselves apparently have voted on paper ballots, contradicting allegations and representations in their pleadings about Arizona’s use of paper ballots — there is not a sufficient record that compels the Court to exercise its discretion to sanction Plaintiffs under that part of the rule,” the judge wrote — leaving the plaintiffs’ attorneys themselves on the hook for the defendants’ fees.

While the judge generally suggested that the plaintiffs had connected themselves with a less than admirable piece of litigation, he was careful not to bash them repeatedly or entirely. For instance, the judge declined to agree with the government officials that the plaintiffs brought the case “for an improper purpose” — namely when it became “politically profitable” to do so “to further their political campaigns” among voters who believed the 2020 election was “stolen” from Donald Trump.

Despite that finding, the judge did criticize the general trend toward using the federal courts to attempt to settle grievances over allegedly “stolen” elections.

“The Court shares the concerns expressed by other federal courts about misuse of the judicial system to baselessly cast doubt on the electoral process in a manner that is conspicuously consistent with the plaintiffs’ political ends,” he noted.

As support for that premise, the judge cited a spate of Trump-related election lawsuits connected to the 2020 presidential contest, including Trump’s thus-far-failed racketeering lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and a bevy of other real or perceived political foes.

The judge agreed to award “the Maricopa County Defendants’ reasonable attorneys’ fees” as a sanction, but the precise calculation of those fees remains an outstanding question. It will be settled, the judge ruled, through future paperwork submissions that are due no later than 14 days from Thursday’s order.

The lawsuit, Judge Tuchi concluded, “forced Defendants and their counsel to spend time and resources defending this frivolous lawsuit rather than preparing for the elections over which Plaintiffs’ claims baselessly kicked up a cloud of dust.”

“Plaintiffs’ counsel are therefore held jointly and severally liable for the Maricopa County Defendants’ attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred in this case,” he said — meaning everyone is on the hook.

The judge concluded with this missive about the case:

Imposing sanctions in this case is not to ignore the importance of putting in place procedures to ensure that our elections are secure and reliable. It is to make clear that the Court will not condone litigants ignoring the steps that Arizona has already taken toward this end and furthering false narratives that baselessly undermine public trust at a time of increasing disinformation about, and distrust in, the democratic process. It is to send a message to those who might file similarly baseless suits in the future.

Five members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors requested the sanctions; Hobbs — who has been declared the winner of the 2022 Arizona governor’s race against Lake — was not among those awarded sanctions on Thursday.

Dershowitz did not immediately respond to a Law&Crime email seeking comment.

The order granting sanctions is here.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14834
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2023 3:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oh answer to the thread title, well so he can get more massages at Epstein's mansion. again why the F do you defend without any question a serial pedophile that is rich when you are rich. Only one motive in my book, Epstein would release info about you.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/conservative-comedian-grills-alan-dershowitz-over-massages-he-got-at-jeffrey-epstein-s-mansion/ar-AA17TDpJ?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=b20e6ce366d54039be0e5e151e4f67d1&ei=10

Conservative comedian grills Alan Dershowitz over massages he got at Jeffrey Epstein's mansion


Quote:
During an appearance on conservative comedian Alex Stein's new show on The Blaze, Alan Dershowitz was peppered with questions about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and an alleged massage he received at Epstein's mansion.

Alan Dershowitz
Alan Dershowitz
© Raw Story
Stein played a clip from an interview Dershowitz gave to The Hill back in August, where he explained that there was nothing illegal about the massage and that it was done by a 40-year-old professional massage therapist named Olga.

"You admitted to a massage with Jeffrey Epstein -- that sounds bad in theory," Stein said. "I don't know, I'm just saying, as an attorney how do we justify that? Even in that clip, you said you didn't get many massages and all of a sudden you're at Jeffrey Epstein's having a massage. It just raises red flags to the conspiracy theorists that are watching."

Dershowitz claimed that he was having neck pains and his wife arranged the massage or him, and she had one as well. Since Dershowitz was representing Epstein at the time, he said Epstein suggested the massage therapist to the couple.

Related video: Lawmakers file bill to unseal Jeffrey Epstein secret grand jury testimony (WPBF West Palm Beach)

WPBF West Palm Beach
Lawmakers file bill to unseal Jeffrey Epstein secret grand jury testimony

"I did nothing wrong," Dershowitz added, saying that he's the one who publicly disclosed the massage. "I have nothing to hide, I wanted it all out there."

"I don't want to infer any guilt whatsoever," Stein said. "The problem is, you look at Jeffrey Epstein and his relationship with Prince Andrew ... I'm just saying, these high, powerful people -- it's very intriguing, especially for me."

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14834
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Sat Aug 05, 2023 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/martha-s-vineyard-blocks-sale-of-alan-dershowitz-s-books-defending-trump-i-ve-been-canceled/ar-AA1ePCBC?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=3660b709e55340e98cb4280cf3a9cf6e&ei=15

Martha’s Vineyard Blocks Sale of Alan Dershowitz’s Books Defending Trump: ‘I’ve Been Canceled’


Quote:
lan Dershowitz, a well-known author and US attorney claims he is facing repercussions for supporting former President Donald Trump.

Dershowitz, who defended the Republican front-runner during his first impeachment trial and made several appearances on right-wing media for the same reason, said that his books have now been banned from Martha's Vineyard Book Fair.


During an interview on Newsmax's The Record, Dershowitz expressed his disdain at being ostracized and shunned by the community of Martha's Vineyard.

Host, Greta Van Susteren, concurred, acknowledging the hostility that those who defend Trump often face. “I used to represent people charged with murder,” said Van Susteren who is a former attorney.

“I never got ostracized. And I was never for murdering or anything, but you dare represent Donald Trump, you’re gonna be ostracized” said the talk show host.

Dershowitz revealed that despite being the author of numerous books and having previously been a feature at the book fair every year, his works were now forbidden from being sold at the event.

He questioned why a book fair, which is meant to promote literature and intellectual exchange, would restrict authors based on their political beliefs and free speech.


He asserted that canceling individuals for exercising their rights under the First and Sixth Amendments is not only unjust but also goes against the principles of the fair.

This is not the first time Dershowitz has faced backlash from Martha's Vineyard. Last year, he complained about being blackballed by the small town of Chilmark. He claimed that the Chilmark Library canceled his annual speech, leading many locals to express their disappointment.

Dershowitz's association with Trump has also caused tension with comedian Larry David, who reportedly called the attorney and his enclave "disgusting."

While Dershowitz attributes this ban to his defense of Donald Trump, he emphasizes that he remains unfazed by the situation as, according to him, he continues to sell thousands of books.


Dershowitz concluded the interview by criticizing the Martha's Vineyard community for allowing cancel culture to prevail and urged the people to ensure that the festival does not morph into a "book unfair."

Dershowitz is a prominent lawyer and professor and has been recognized as one of the most influential defenders of individual rights and civil liberties.

He served as the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and authored numerous books, including the New York Times bestseller "Chutzpah," throughout his career, per Harvard Law School.

Due to his fame, his political opinions keep making it into the news. In an interview on The Brian Kilmeade Show, Dershowitz argued that the Justice Department will have to prove that Trump knew and believed he had lost the 2020 presidential election in order to prevail in court.


Fox quotes him saying:

“But the main point of principle that I really want to get over is that, and this applies to both parties, the leading candidate against the incumbent president should never be prosecuted by the attorney general of the president, of course, unless the case against him is overwhelming and beyond any dispute.”

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real-human



Joined: 02 Jul 2011
Posts: 14834
Location: on earth

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 4:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yep this Epstein lover defender is opening his right wing pie hole again. Again defending the serial mass pediophile is despicable. So of course he loves Epstein's best friend pediophile trump.

https://www.rawstory.com/alan-dershowitz-trump-convictions/?utm_source=msn

Alan Dershowitz: 'We're going to have some convictions of Donald Trump' before the election


Quote:
aw professor Alan Dershowitz predicted that Donald Trump would be convicted in multiple jurisdictions before the 2024 presidential election.


During a Thursday interview on Real America's Voice, host Gina Loudon asked the longtime attorney if any of Trump's four criminal cases would be resolved before the election.

"Oh yeah, that's the problem," Dershowitz replied. "We're going to have some convictions of Donald Trump because he's being tried in districts where you can't get a fair trial, and then these convictions will be reversed after the election."

"The strategy is down and dirty, unlawful convictions to influence the election, and then we don't care if they're reversed after the election because, by that time, it will have had the intended impact on the election," he continued. "So yeah, I think we'll see some convictions."

Dershowitz claimed prosecutors could "convict a ham sandwich" in New York "if his name is Trump."

"I think the same thing is true in Fulton County," he added.

ADVERTISEMENT

The lawyer argued that Trump's federal election interference case in Washington, D.C., should be brought after the election.

"Read the Constitution," he remarked. "It's the right of the defendant to a speedy trial. The defendant also has the right to prepare for a trial adequately, and if you have 12 million pages of discovery, no lawyer can prepare for a trial within several months."

"This trial definitely ought to be put off until after the election," Dershowitz concluded.


The attorney has previously predicted Trump would be convicted in New York City but was unclear if it would happen before the election.

_________________
when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group