myiW Current Conditions and Forecasts Community Forums Buy and Sell Services
 
Hi guest · myAccount · Log in
 SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   RegisterRegister 
The fruits of austerity
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17780
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right you are Boggsy. At some point the raving rationalizations of the right are only of interest to mental health clinicians.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mrgybe



Joined: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 5181

PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, to summarize.......

- the Flint water supply was contaminated due to numerous local/ state level governmental missteps
- the EPA knew that the drinking water was unsafe in February 2015
- The EPA didn't advise water consumers that the water was toxic. Those consumers continued to drink the water for a further 7 months until the story broke
- a former EPA employee here tells us it would have been illegal and unethical for the EPA to take action to prevent families from drinking toxic water and says that arguments that they should have acted, are the "raving rationalizations of the right". Apparently, lifelong behavioral/neurological problems from lead poisoning must be subordinated to inter agency squabbling.
- the regional head of the EPA resigned for reasons our EPA alumnus presumably can't fathom

Hands up all those who think that the EPA were right to keep quiet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17780
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's in the hands of the mental health specialists. Clearly those that taught reading and critical thinking have failed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
isobars



Joined: 12 Dec 1999
Posts: 20946

PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mrgybe wrote:
Hands up all those who think that the EPA were right to keep quiet.

Man ... that's a toughie.
1. It depends on whether their obligation is to the man who determines their year-end bonuses, or to the taxpayers who provided the money in the first place.
2. It also depends on whether their job description says "Collect data", or "Use that data for the public good".
3. And it depends on whether their ultimate boss believes in doing the right thing and encouraging the DOJ to prosecute any EPA officials who failed to act immediately, as I'm guessing Trump or Sanders would do but about which The Wannabe Liar in Chief would just ask, "As this point, what difference does it make?"

The sad part is that the left actually agrees with #1 and #2 and calls #3 "torture".

Yet it surely doesn't take the EPA long to take complete control of private land which gets damp enough to form a puddle seasonally. Does BSNBC not inform their viewer about the people who buy land with visions of a yard, a garden, a sandbox for the kids, maybe a horse pasture or a fishing pond ... you know ... whatever the HELL they want to do with THEIR LAND within zoning laws ... but are then ordered by the EPA not only to cease and desist ANY modification but to also pay fines of thousands of dollars every DAY they do not kiss the EPA's royal ass? The EPA's excuse? That puddle flows downhill until it ultimately reaches navigable water and becomes the propitty of the F.U.S. Government, so why wait ... just call it theirs right here, right now and save them the trouble. Think that's fickshun? Sorry; watch the interviews of landowners who lost their land, even went bankrupt in the fight, because the FEPA found a seasonal damp spot in their yard, forest, or field and called it a WETLAND.

OTOH, that works both ways. My neighborhood was threatened by a developer and nearby town that wanted to create a permanent major sewage aqueduct and access road through our back yards. We (scores of us; this was a major project) threatened to call in the EPA on their efforts to destroy a permanent creek providing habitat to a wide variety of small and large animals, some endangered.

Think about that when you see western states ranchers protesting government takeovers of land they homesteaded 200 years ago or leased 90 years ago for 99 years. There's often some ... or even a LOT of ... validity to their claims.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MalibuGuru



Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 9307

PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just read another article about the river polluted by the EPA. Horrible.

But, this lead thing is serious. I believe Mac and Baja may have ingested some. As we know, lead causes mental disorders and, Liberalism is a mental disorder. Is it possible that the liberals in the EPA and Flint are all too happy disabling rational minded people with lead, thereby increasing their voting base....?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17780
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:05 pm    Post subject: r Reply with quote

The rest of the know-nothings weigh in, parotting talking points by the GOP that describe Flint as a failure of government, and bashing EPA. Perhaps EPA could and should have done more--but I don't see the Governor falling on his sword as the EPA Regional Adminisrator did.

This entire line of reasoning is horseshit. The decision to change water supplies was part of conscious Republican strategy. It is much worse for the hollowed out cities of color in the rust belt. Republican ignorance, contempt for science and civil service and infrastructure. When the State agencies, led by political appointees of the Republican governor, who were responsible for oversight ignored the problem, Republcans argue that EPA's failure to directly notice the citizensis equivalent. Nonsense. Republicans have systematically fought funding for oversight and infrastructure to the point that the unfunded water infrastructure is over $500 billion, more than 60 million people have watewr supplies that are not safe, and no new chemicals have been added to scrutiny under the Drinking Water Act for decades. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/17/us/17water.html?_r=0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MalibuGuru



Joined: 11 Nov 1993
Posts: 9307

PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Look, I'm the first one here who thinks that if the governor new that there was lead in the pipes and wanted these people to drink the water that he should be charged with a felony.

What is more likely , is that the EPA and local officials knew exactly what was going on in their pipes in their city and in their water supply.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17780
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm, it may be harder for the governor to duck this one, even with the gybster's relentless spinning. an e-mail was just released from Mike Glasgow, who was the water plant's water quality supervisor. He said that his superiors were prodding him to move faster than prudent. On April 17, 2014, he wrote to the state Department of Environmental Quality, to whit "If water is distributed from this plant in the next couple weeks, it will be against my direction. I need time to adequately train additional staff and to update our monitoring plans before I will feel we are ready."

Perhaps if he had blown the whistle to EPA's Regional Administrator they might have been more helpful. (Mrgybe's citation, used out of context to spin, means that he would have been protected from retaliation.)

There is a long list of conservative de-regulatory ideas that have turned out to be expensive disasters. But when you don't pay attention to the facts, you never figure that out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mrgybe



Joined: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 5181

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote me stating that the Governor wasn't at fault.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mac



Joined: 07 Mar 1999
Posts: 17780
Location: Berkeley, California

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 3:47 pm    Post subject: au Reply with quote

Reading comprehension eludes you again? Mrgybe has repeatedly repeated the GOP claims that this is a failure of government at all levels. In fact, it is a direct result of bad judgement and ideological zeal by the Republican governor and his appointees. Against, it now is established, advice from those who knew better. Spin that between your cheeks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iWindsurf Community Forum Index -> Politics, Off-Topic, Opinions All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 4 of 10

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

myiW | Weather | Community | Membership | Support | Log in
like us on facebook
© Copyright 1999-2007 WeatherFlow, Inc Contact Us Ad Marketplace

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group