View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14888 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what a whore of a hypocrite, a true republican Chucky grassley is, a true hero to the right...... _________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14888 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
https://www.rawstory.com/clarence-ginni-thomas/?cx_testId=4&cx_testVariant=cx_1&cx_artPos=3&cx_experienceId=EXC93HV4HK4I#cxrecs_s
Clarence Thomas refusing to recuse in Ginni Thomas cases would 'tarnish' SCOTUS integrity: Joyce Vance
Quote: | Justice Clarence Thomas has diminished the credibility of the Supreme Court by refusing to recuse himself in a case about the Jan. 6 attack that involved his wife, far-right activist Ginni Thomas, argued former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance during an interview with MSNBC's Ari Melber on Tuesday.
Melber started out by noting that Thomas this week admitted she attended a "Stop the Steal" event on January 6th, but said her husband has still refused to recuse himself from January 6th-related cases. |
Thomas was lone standout to try to stop investigations and proceedings in case his wife was involved in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu85zPLp-H0&t=2s
0:50 / 7:43
Joyce Vance _________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14888 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/embarrassing-how-indiana-residents-reacted-to-mike-braun-s-interracial-marriage-comments/ar-AAVpOHI?ocid=BingNews
'Embarrassing': How Indiana residents reacted to Mike Braun's interracial marriage comments
Quote: | In a press call Tuesday, Sen. Mike Braun said the U.S. Supreme Court was incorrect in legalizing interracial marriage in a landmark case in 1967, and that the decision should have been left to the states.
A closer look: Indiana senators Todd Young and Mike Braun
Braun's comments came during an open-ended conference call with media, during which he discussed confirmation hearings for President Joe Biden's Supreme Court nominee, Ketanji Brown Jackson. That's when he began discussing what he called "judicial activism."
After Braun said he believed abortion rights should've been left up to the states in the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, Dan Carden, a reporter with the Times of Northwest Indiana, asked if he felt the same way about Loving v. Virginia, which struck down all state laws banning interracial marriage.
Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.
Read more: Mike Braun walks back comments that interracial marriage ruling should have been left to states
"When it comes to issues, you can't have it both ways," Braun said. "When you want that diversity to shine within our federal system, there are going to be rules and proceedings, they're going to be out of sync with maybe what other states would do. It's the beauty of the system, and that's where the differences among points of view in our 50 states ought to express themselves."
Mike Braun gives his acceptance speech GOP election night event at the JW Marriott, Indianapolis, Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2018.
© RobertScheer, Robert Scheer/IndyStar
Mike Braun gives his acceptance speech GOP election night event at the JW Marriott, Indianapolis, Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2018.
Just a few hours later, Braun attempted to walk back his comments, saying he "misunderstood the line of questioning." |
_________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
isobars
Joined: 12 Dec 1999 Posts: 20935
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2022 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why should a Supremes candidate who can't and won't even try to articulate her definition of the word "woman" be entrusted to evaluate today's countless legal issues involving gender? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
J64TWB
Joined: 24 Dec 2013 Posts: 1685
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2022 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here you go Isobars, it’s complicated.
Let’s start here.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/hermaphrodite
From the Bible.
Women in the Bible are victors and victims, women who change the course of historical events, and women who are powerless to affect even their own destinies.
From Dictionary.com
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/woman
From Merriam-Webster Webster
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/woman
My stepsister, who I’ve only known for only 3 years is 53. She used to be John, my step brother who I knew for 35 years. John is gone. Try and wrap your head around that. She is finally complete and happy not hiding, married and doing great. Can you imagine how strongly one must feel to have a sex change? It’s your entire existence, nothing less.
You got a problem with that Isobars? What if you were John, what would you do? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SAS
Joined: 18 Feb 1997 Posts: 177 Location: planet earth
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2022 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Iso
Do you have any problem with Clarence Thomas hearing cases regardi the election when his wife was actively trying to overturn a fair election?
You likely don't know this becasue you get biased news, but he was the only justice you didn't want Trump's records to be released to the House committee investigating the Capitol riot.
That reeks of bias and judicial activism. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vientomas
Joined: 25 Apr 2000 Posts: 2343
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2022 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
isobars wrote: | Why should a Supremes candidate who can't and won't even try to articulate her definition of the word "woman" be entrusted to evaluate today's countless legal issues involving gender? |
Listen up Iso-angry! Apparently you don't follow Supreme Court nominee hearings much. Many nominees have refused to answer such questions for the reason you state..."countless legal issues involving gender." To answer would be in effect to prejudge a case.
Where was your outrage to this?
On abortion rights and whether Roe v. Wade should be struck down, Barrett said it would be "wrong" for her to answer because "it signals to litigants I might tilt one way or another on a pending case." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14888 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2022 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
real-human wrote: | https://www.rawstory.com/clarence-ginni-thomas/?cx_testId=4&cx_testVariant=cx_1&cx_artPos=3&cx_experienceId=EXC93HV4HK4I#cxrecs_s
Clarence Thomas refusing to recuse in Ginni Thomas cases would 'tarnish' SCOTUS integrity: Joyce Vance
Quote: | Justice Clarence Thomas has diminished the credibility of the Supreme Court by refusing to recuse himself in a case about the Jan. 6 attack that involved his wife, far-right activist Ginni Thomas, argued former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance during an interview with MSNBC's Ari Melber on Tuesday.
Melber started out by noting that Thomas this week admitted she attended a "Stop the Steal" event on January 6th, but said her husband has still refused to recuse himself from January 6th-related cases. |
Thomas was lone standout to try to stop investigations and proceedings in case his wife was involved in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu85zPLp-H0&t=2s
0:50 / 7:43
Joyce Vance |
good point now we know one of the reasons trump does not want communications out of his lynching party.
Quote: | When ex-President Donald Trump sued to block the release of White House documents and communications sought by the House committee investigating his effort to overturn the 2020 election, there was only one member of the Supreme Court to take his side: Justice Clarence Thomas. Thomas did not disclose it at the time, but we now know that he had a significant conflict of interest in this and related cases. His wife, Virginia Thomas, who goes by Ginni, repeatedly communicated with White House officials in her effort to improperly overturn Joe Biden’s election win, according to a new report by CBS News and The Washington Post. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14888 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2022 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ginni-thomas-must-be-subpoenaed-by-jan-6-committee-glenn-kirschner/ar-AAVysr6?ocid=EMMX
Former U.S. Army prosecutor Glenn Kirschner said that Virginia "Ginni" Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, "must be subpoenaed" by the House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021 attack against the U.S. Capitol after her text messages with a top Trump administration official were reported this past week.
Quote: | Former U.S. Army prosecutor Glenn Kirschner said that Virginia "Ginni" Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, "must be subpoenaed" by the House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021 attack against the U.S. Capitol after her text messages with a top Trump administration official were reported this past week.
The Washington Post and CBS News together reported on Thursday that Virginia Thomas, a conservative activist, sent multiple text messages to former President Donald Trump's White House chief of staff Mark Meadows ahead of the attack against the U.S. Capitol and Republican attempt to overturn President Joe Biden's Electoral College victory last year. Those messages expressed strong support for efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and advised the then White House official regarding legal counsel Trump should utilize.
What Ginni Thomas’ Texts To Meadow On Overturning The 2020 Election Reveal
"Help This Great President stand firm, Mark!!!...You are the leader, with him, who is standing for America's constitutional governance at the precipice. The majority knows Biden and the Left is attempting the greatest Heist of our History," she wrote in a November 10 message to Meadows. She also told the White House official that controversial right-wing attorney Sidney Powell should be "the lead and the face" of efforts to overturn Biden's win.
"First of all, Ginni Thomas must be subpoenaed by the January 6 committee to get to the bottom of the influence that she was sort of passing from the Oval Office potentially to her husband, a Supreme Court justice," Kirschner told MSNBC on Sunday.
The attorney continued, saying that she "needs to be investigated by the Department of Justice to see if her conduct rises to the level of being part and parcel to the conspiracy to—not just unconstitutionally—but possibly criminally overturn the election results."
Virginia and Clarence Thomas have faced substantial criticism in the wake of the reporting on her text messages with Meadows. A number of legal experts have contended that Clarence Thomas should recuse himself from any Supreme Court cases related to Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election and the events of January 6.
"Clarence Thomas cannot sit on any matter involving the election, the invasion of the Capitol, or the work of the January 6 Committee," New York University law professor Stephen Gillers told The New Yorker last week, asserting that the judge's wife "crossed a line."
"I agree fully with NYU's Stephen Gillers," Harvard constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe posted to Twitter on Friday. "Justice Thomas must take no part in the consideration of any case related to the 2020 election, the 1/6 Committee, the attempted coup, or the insurrection."
Questions and criticism of Virginia Thomas and her right-wing activism had already been circulating prior to the revelations about her text messages with Meadows. However, she insisted to the Washington Free Beacon earlier in March that her husband "doesn't discuss his work with me, and I don't involve him in my work."
Newsweek contacted the Supreme Court's Public Information Office for comment from Clarence Thomas, but has not received a response.
Some lawmakers have also urged Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from future cases relating to the 2020 election and January 6.
"At the bare minimum, Justice Thomas needs to recuse himself from any case related to the January 6th investigation, and should Donald Trump run again, any case related to the 2024 election," Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, said in a Friday statement.
Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat, echoed those sentiments in a Sunday interview with ABC News' This Week.
"You have the wife of a sitting Supreme Court justice advocating for an insurrection, advocating for overturning a legal election to the sitting president's chief of staff and she also knows this election, these cases, are going to come before her husband. This is a textbook case for removing him, recusing him from these decisions," Klobuchar, who is a lawyer and former county attorney, said.
Senator Rob Portman, an Ohio Republican, said that he would "respect" Clarence Thomas' opinion on whether or not he should recuse himself in a Sunday interview with NBC News' Meet the Press. However, he noted that the text messages "might be an issue" if cases related to January 6 records come before the Supreme Court.
Newsweek reached out to the Conservative Partnership Institute where Meadows is a senior partner for further comment, but did not immediately receive a response. |
_________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
real-human
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 Posts: 14888 Location: on earth
|
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2022 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ginni is a friggen lunitc
she was telling Meadows biden and his conspiritors and were on the way to getmo...
and her best friend was in the know...
Impeach the traitor...
the media is not putting out her truely delusional hate texts... can you imagine if hillary made such claims.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7f_srmCU_0
Ginni Thomas’ SHOCKING Election Overthrow Texts Exposed
Quote: | Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, the wife of conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, repeatedly texted former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows about overthrowing the 2020 election in Trump’s favor. The texts were collected by the January 6th Committee’s seizure of Mark Meadows’ documents and show Thomas and Meadows frantically communicating about the plot in the weeks between the election and the Senate confirmation hearing. Cenk Uygur, John Iadarola, and Maz Jobrani discuss on The Young Turks. Watch LIVE weekdays 6-8 pm ET. |
_________________ when good people stay silent the right wing are the only ones heard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|