Global Warming vs Peak Oil

MikeLaRonde · Joined: 11 Jun 2001 Posts: 768

Greetings, and welcome to my first and hopefully last new topic. I think it's safe to say that "climate change" has now replaced the "pandemic" as the most important controversial thing, eh?

The 2 theories in the subject are certainly not mutually exclusive. But they sure seem to be in contention for the true reasons behind "Agenda 2030" (specifically, the nearly complete stoppage of "fossil fuel" usage).

That is, assuming one can call BS on "climate change" as presented (and soon to be shouted louder than ever) by the PTB/media.
The way I see it, one can either choose to accept the "climate change/c02 boogeyman theory" without question, or else you have a choice to make. Because, you can't just call BS without a competing theory, right?
I can think of at least one other (third) possibility ...

mac · Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2024 10:12 pm Post subject:

Only a complete idiot thinks that scientific principles are a matter of opinion.

MikeLaRonde · Joined: 11 Jun 2001 Posts: 768

mac · Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 3:22 pm Post subject:

As I said, only a complete idiot, who demonstrates no understanding—or curiosity—of climate drivers, would post such nonsense. One of the few amusing things about this forum is that complete idiots sometimes reveal the utter nonsense that they bathe their brains in. Like this “source”. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/free-west-media/

There is a huge amount of money to be made selling fossil fuels that will kill our grandchildren—and kill hundreds of thousands a year now. They can afford to support a complete false narrative—and there are apparently plenty of complete idiots who will swallow it whole. Under the misunderstanding that they are challenging the elites.

A mind is a sad thing to pickle.

MikeLaRonde · Joined: 11 Jun 2001 Posts: 768

mac · Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 4:57 pm Post subject:

Drunk from Boston--why would anyone read any paranoid link you post, much less from free west media? Complete with a dog whistle? Sober up, read a little science about CO2 and the actual measurements of heat absorbed in the ocean, find out who is paying outfits like free west media to brain wash you, and then post something worth a serious response.

MikeLaRonde · Joined: 11 Jun 2001 Posts: 768

Another pathetic, predictable response:

1. Avoids the question
2. Adds more insults
3. Tries to obscure the matter with "holier than thou" rhetoric (including, but not limited to, playing the "science as religion" card over and again).

Here's some real science for you, Jim-bone: trees consume CO2, and release O2. What's the difference between CO2 and O2? hmm... C ?

Now, lets say that more CO2 is really a bad thing. Call me simple minded, but common sense sure suggests that it is in humanity's best wishes that more trees remain standing, and only a COMPLETE IDIOT should disagree with that.

So far so good, right? But wait, now they're telling us that it's not just CO2, but carbon that is the bad guy. So now just maybe, killing trees and buying them might make sense (to a total psychopath like Gates)

Of course, you could have just said that this news story was complete BS. But, you didn't and you can't, for the reasons listed above.

If only that were true. Here it is from site you might respect:

https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/12/15/1065016/a-stealth-effort-to-bury-wood-for-carbon-removal-has-just-raised-millions/

Try to notice how the article never once specifically mentions C02, only CARBON

MalibuGuru · Joined: 11 Nov 1993 Posts: 9300

MikeLaRonde · Joined: 11 Jun 2001 Posts: 768

mac · Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:03 pm Post subject:

Even a blind pig sometimes finds an acorn.